However, the regulation of information on the internet takes away people's right to free speech therefore People should have control over the material they and their hildren can access themselves as the Internet is something that they buy access to and which they then choose to surf on their own. Internet censorship protects Women and children by blocking the access to Inappropriate information In a time where the pornography industry is increasingly competitive and many adult website think they need to provide more diversions by advocating violent sexual abuse of women and children.However this may also block the use of some useful Information for instance content about the book "Moby Dick," as pointed out by Mitch Wagner of Computer World.
China use extensive firewall systems to block any Information from the Internet which they perceive to be offensive or threatening to their regimes and If a citizen is caught dissenting from the nation using the Internet then they may face severe penalties. This may be used as It prevents discrimination by threats and offensive views to Its regime but at the same time It violates the right of freedom of speech.Webmaster's right to freedom of speech Is also violated when a website Is forced to shut down or modify Its legal content but freedom of speech should be llowed but to a certain extent up to which It doesn't become offensive for nations. Therefore some nations may control It considering the Information they would like their society to access blocking out the offensive material as It will prevent a bad Impact on the society and keep up the moral. However It could be unfair for responsible users who want the Information as facts and oplnlons regardless of It being offensive and so people's views aren't passed on.In conclusion, my oplnlon Is that there Is no doubt that Internet censorship violates the right to freedom of peech and It shouldn't be done as everyone holds the right to express their oplnlons and even though some people find It offensive It doesn't mean that their opinions shouldn't be passed on, Instead people could argue against them but the Information shouldn't be totally blocked as It creates lack of awareness In people about what Is going on around the world.
Words: 544 Zoha Fatima Women and children by blocking the access to inappropriate information in a time women and children. However this may also block the use of some useful information Computer World. China use extensive firewall systems to block any information from evere penalties. This may be used as it prevents discrimination by threats and offensive views to its regime but at the same time it violates the right of freedom of speech.Webmaster's right to freedom of speech is also violated when a website is forced to shut down or modify its legal content but freedom of speech should be allowed but to a certain extent up to which it doesn't become offensive for nations. Therefore some nations may control it considering the information they would like their society to access blocking out the offensive material as it will prevent a bad impact on the society and keep up the moral.
However it could be unfair for responsible users who want the information as facts and opinions regardless of it being offensive and so people's views aren't passed on. In conclusion, my opinion is that there is no doubt that internet censorship violates the right to freedom of speech and it shouldn't be done as everyone holds the right to express their opinions and even though some people find it offensive it doesn't mean that their opinions shouldn't be passed on, instead people could argue against .
