Employee Rewards Essay

IntroductionThe intent of this essay is to critically analyze the procedures used by Scotia Learning and place if their wagess are appropriate to those of the market. The study will get down by discoursing the background of Scotia Learning and follow on to specify reward direction foregrounding the aim and restraints within the wages scheme. We will so see the legal model and analyze why there are fluctuations in wage and how occupation rating can guarantee equity and equity is achieved.

Finally we will discourse the construct of motive and the deductions of wage for public presentation within the wages scheme. The study ends with an analysis of the cardinal issues of the subject. Scotia Learning is the instance survey for this essay and is one of a web of university-based survey Centres offering readying for pupils wishing to analyze undergraduate and postgraduate grades for patterned advance into university grade classs. The company has joint venture partnerships with top universities throughout the United Kingdom. Ireland and United States of America.“Reward direction is concerned with the preparation and execution of schemes and policies that aim to honor people reasonably.

equitably and systematically in conformity with their value to the organisation” ( Armstrong & A ; Murlis. 2007. p3 ) . Research by Redman & A ; Wilkinson ( 2009 ) indicates that wages is an tremendously complex issue and has to take history of three cardinal rules in finding systems and constructions: internal equity. external equity and concern scheme. In add-on Thorpe & A ; Homan ( 2000 ) province that the administration should place what aims and behaviours the payment system should hold for illustration.

labour market fight and direction accomplishments whilst Perkins & A ; White ( 2009 ) highlight the importance of legal ordinances that can set restraints on administrations. for illustration lower limit pay ( legal ) . corporate bargaining ( trade brotherhoods ) . and the external labor markets.Scotia Learning does non recognize a trade brotherhood nevertheless it does recognize that corporate bargaining has been influential in discoursing and puting wage agreement due to internal and external rates of wage non being equal.

Within the employment statute law wage has ever been an country of contention particularly when one considers employee’s corporate concerns ( Brown et al. . 2003 ) . The debut of The Equal Pay Act 1970 criminalizing unequal wage for work forces and adult females holding since evolved into equal wage for equal work and the Equal Pay ( Amendment ) Regulations 1983 after the UK joined the EU in 1973 ( Perkins & A ; White. 2009 ) .

now gives employees a certain grade of protection in their employment relationship.To beef up current statute law The Equality Act 2010 was introduced foregrounding human rights and prejudiced factors. such as equal wage. sex favoritism. race.

disablement and equality ( faith. sexual orientation. and age ) ( Equality and Human Rights Commission. 2012 ) . In response to this Scotia Learning are cognizant that they have a ‘duty of care’ to all employees and comply with the Equal Opportunities Policy by guaranting the relevant preparation is undertaken by directors and employees guaranting everyone understands the importance of and their duties under this Policy. This is besides promoted in all enlisting paperss.

guaranting that give voicing of occupation advertizements does non know apart against any possible appliers.As portion of this statute law. employers are lawfully required to guarantee their wage constructions are non prejudiced against work forces and adult females in footings of valuing work between them in their employment and in order to support themselves against equal wage claims. administrations must be able to turn out that the occupations within their scaling system are valued harmonizing to the occupation instead than the gender of the individual making the occupation.

Failure to adhere to these ordinances can ensue in a tribunal claim and if proven the administration will hold to pay all money accrued which can be backdated six old ages in England and five old ages in Scotland. In the instance of ( Birmingham City Council v Abdulla and others [ 2012 ] UKSC 47 ) . the Supreme Court ruled that equal wage claims brought in the High Court more than six months after the terminal of the claimants’ employment. which would hold been out of clip in an employment court. should non be struck out under subdivision 2 ( 3 ) of the Equal Pay Act 1970.

The grounds for a claimant’s failure to convey a timely claim in a court are non relevant in any manner to the impression of convenience under subdivision 2 ( 3 ) . ( PLC Employment Law Weekly electronic mail ) . Within Scotia Learning wage and benefits are provided on the footing of nonsubjective standards. free from favoritism taking into history the rule of equal wage for tantamount work or work of equal value.

In add-on we guarantee transparence within the wages system is clear to all employees in that they understand how their wage is worked out and what is required from them to accomplish this. Job profiles and individual specifications for each new vacancy are drawn up in maintaining with other occupations of a similar size and duty which focal point on the accomplishments. experience and makings that are straight relevant to the occupation. Armstrong & A ; Murlis ( 2007. p115 ) province that “the payment system is of import as it non merely conveys a signal to the employees what the organizational precedences are but besides acts as a accelerator for wider organizational change” a position reiterated by Armstrong ( 1996 ) in which he proposes that the foundations of wages direction are to accomplish the person and organizational behavior that a company needs if the concern ends are to be met.Therefore the term ‘employees are the key to heighten organizational performance’ becomes relevant with links to Kessler and Purcell ( 1994 ) where they emphasise that payment systems are related to enlisting.

keeping and motive of staff and that the finding of wage is non merely the interaction of market forces but besides employers. It is besides acknowledged that fluctuations in wage can happen for a assortment of grounds and from a legal position it is of import to understand why ( Redman & A ; Wilkinson. 2009 ) . First the power scenario. in that if labor is scarce.

employees will hold more power and hence may be able to demand higher wage. in contrast with an over-supply of labor employers have the power and hence may be able to keep wage at lower rates ( Redman & A ; Wilkinson. 2009 ) . Second.

it has been acknowledged that ‘the rate for the job’ should be the same for employees making the same occupation but sing organizational public presentation is reliant on the employee’s attempt. accomplishments and competences. it is non logical to presume that attempt should be rewarded and pay should change consequently.A position shared by Redman & A ; Wilkinson ( 2009. p161 ) who advocate that “variable wage strategies ( VPS ) are said to keep out the promise towards the creative activity of internal labor market that is fairer in honoring people as it is merely ‘fair’ that wagess should hold a direct nexus with effort” . The statement with this theory is that ‘risk adverse’ workers will be less willing to ‘gamble’ on wage related public presentation than a set sum of wage.

Third. we should besides take into consideration the external market rate of wage and uneven market force per unit areas such as differing regional or occupational rates of wage as Kessler ( 2007. p167 ) states “external equity is an organizational jussive mood as failure to react the labor market alterations will go forth administrations at a disadvantage competitively” . Scotia Learning responds to these challenges by regularly benchmarking and analyzing the market rate of wage within the educational sector. Data collected is good in finding wage to guarantee wage graduated tables are in line with and competitory with similar occupations.

For illustration. when enrolling learning staff. the usage of administrations such as SATEFL and other educational web sites are peculiarly utile. for disposal staff we would utilize S1jobs. com and jobseeker.

gov. uk web site and with direction we would utilize bureaus. However. although the aforementioned scheme is really utile.

Scotia Learning is a comparatively big administration with Centres worldwide and other factors have to be taken into consideration. such as location and cost of life. In finding the value of occupations within our administration. although we consider the external market wage rates. determinations refering wage are done through a coherent pay and calling construction internal to our administration which ensures consistence and equity in our wages systems.

It has been reported that issues with this wages system have arisen within the banking sector ensuing in Government intercession to cover with inequalities of wage scene at senior management/director degree and low wage via the national lower limit pay.This is non an country of concern for Scotia Learning as the one-year salary addition is a % rate consistent throughout the administration and our wage construction procedure involves a occupation rating “a systematic procedure for set uping the comparative worth of occupations within an organisation” Redman & A ; Wilkinson ( 2009. p141 ) . In add-on Scotia Learning is accredited to the British Council and British Accreditation Council and all HR policies and forces files are decently documented and filed. Our occupation rating comprises of an analytical ( i. e.

. occupations are broken down into single constituents ) broad-band wage construction with a scope of factors such as cognition and accomplishments. job work outing. determination devising and so apportioning points to them. It is interesting to observe that research by IRS ( 2007 ) showed that an norm of 86 % of administrations use this signifier of occupation rating.

Within this broad-band wage construction we have 6 broad overlapping salary sets made up of direction. HR. learning staff. finance. pupil services and cleaning staff with a salary scope for each bank of at least 75 % .Progression up the sets will be by accomplishments and makings.

public presentation and competency enhanced through single calling development therefore providing the motive for uninterrupted acquisition. To back up this. the one-year public presentation reappraisal takes topographic point. nevertheless it is non linked to pay or wagess and is based on the aims of accomplishments and competency which are linked to organizational public presentation. In footings of equity and fairness the rate of wage for full-time and parttime instruction staff is calculated on the same hourly rate therefore guaranting consistence and equity within the system.

It is interesting to observe that research by Redman & A ; Wilkinson ( 2009. p139 ) argues that by paying an hourly rate “employers control over gait and public presentation is reliant on either direct supervising or the willingness of employees to prosecute with the task” synonymous with the statement environing ‘risk adverse’ workers.This point of position may be feasible in administrations such as ‘call centres’ where engineering enables the monitoring and regulation of work by mensurating end product and input and within the client service industry where we have the ‘secret shopper’ . but within the instruction sector liberty is portion of the occupation as is their professional codification of moralss which includes committedness. motive and discretional behavior which is contradictory to the statement by Thorpe & A ; Homan ( 2000 ) who suggest that non-financial facets are secondary and seldom given the same prominence in the design of payment systems. Pull offing wagess is mostly about pull offing employee outlooks associating to their psychological contract which is concerned with wage.

public presentation and the development of accomplishments ( Armstrong & A ; Murlis. 2007 ) .The statement so becomes. if reactions to wagess depend on the psychological make-up. values and demands of person. one can non entirely trust on public presentation related wage strategies to heighten all employees’ public presentation as non everyone is motivated by money.

Motivation merely takes topographic point if wagess are worthwhile to the person and if the procedure is seen to be just. therefore. it would necessitate to be customised for every person in the administration ( Armstrong & A ; Murlis. 2007 ) . For illustration.

an employee approaching the terminal of their calling may be more interested in occupation satisfaction ( intrinsic wages ) . whereas a alumnus get downing their calling may be more interested in preparation and development ( extrinsic wages ) .For that ground it can be argued that both intrinsic wagess such as regard. acknowledgment.

occupation satisfaction and duty are merely every bit of import as extrinsic wagess such as wage rises. fillips. preparation and development chances and benefits such as one-year vacations. company ill wage and company pension.

This highlights the importance of implementing an just and just wages scheme in that by integrating fiscal and non-financial wagess is that they can be used as a tool to heighten employee motive ensuing in improved organizational public presentation. Finally the importance of direction accomplishments can non be undermined as they are a cardinal component of human resource direction. The direction scheme within Scotia Learning is based on liberty. communicating and high degrees of trust between direction and employees.

Evidence to back up this is the turnover rate of staff with one employee resigning over the past two old ages and the one-year absence degrees within Scotia Learning for all staff inclusive bases at 0. 1 % of working hours. which is the lowest in the full administration.DecisionThis aim of the study was to set up the procedures that guarantee equity and equity in the wages systems. We have covered the legal facets.

schemes. market consciousness. motive. occupation rating and public presentation assessment and it has become apparent that Scotia Learning complies with all legal statute law. and displays equity and equity within the wages systems.

However there was an air of negativeness environing public presentation and wages as within Scotia Learning the one-year assessment is non yet connected to pay for public presentation. It is possible that issues could originate if this was implemented. viz. . it could earnestly impact the kineticss of the office environment between a really closely-nit squad of employees.

directors and managers in that. how does the director warrant their determination in the event of a low wages without impacting the equilibrium of the office environment and within a nonionized administration all trade brotherhoods argue against public presentation linked to pay.Schemes associating wage to public presentation. although bring forthing a enormous sum of involvement have really small in the manner of conclusive grounds refering their effects on public presentation ( Redman & A ; Wilkinson. ( 2009 ) . This echoes Thompson ( 1992 ) findings in which he states.

“research fails to supply converting grounds of a nexus between single performance-related wage strategies and betterments in productivity” . The grounds supports that other attacks should be considered in honoring employees. for illustration a one-off fillip payment which would non impact the employees’ one-year wage.Mentions
Armstrong.

M. ( 1996 ) Employee Reward. London: Kogan Page/IPD Armstrong. M. .

and Murlis. H. ( 2007 ) Reward Management. 5thedn.

London: Hay Group Brown. W. . Marginson. P. .

and Walsh. J. ( 2003 ) The direction of wage as the influence of corporate bargaining diminishes. In: P. K. Edwards.

Industrial Relations: Theory and Practice. Oxford: Blackwell IRS ( 2007 ) Job rating is booming. study finds: Employment Review. 667 Kessler. I.

( 2007 ) Reward Choices: scheme and equity. In: Storey. J. HRM: a critical text 3rd edition.

London: Thomson Learning Kessler. I. . and Purcell. J. ( 1994 ) Performance Related Wage: Aims and application.

Human Resource Management Journal. Vol. 2. No.

3 Perkins. S. J. . and White.

G. ( 2009 ) Employee Reward: Options. effects and contexts. 2nd edn. London: Chartered Institute Of Personnel and Development.

Redman. T. . and Wilkinson. A.

( 2009 ) Contemporary Human Resource Management: Text & A ; Cases. 3rd edn. London: Prentice Hall. Thompson.

M. ( 1992 ) Pay for Performance: The employers experience. Brighton. Institute of Manpower Studies Thorpe.

R. . and Homan. G ( 2000 ) Strategic Reward Systems. Harlow: Financial Times Williams.

S. . and Adam-Smith. D. ( 2006 ) Contemporary Employment Relationss: A critical debut.

Oxford: University Press Equality of Human Rights Commission. available from: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. equalityhumanrights. com/human-rights/ – day of the month accessed 23/10/12 PLC Employment Law. available from: [ electronic mail protected ]– day of the month accessed 26/10/12