Recently, enormous interest has been provided by organisations to observe different factors and aspects that promote better job satisfaction. The interest of job satisfaction is to be believed that the activities of gratified workers will make constructive contributions and thoughts to the organisational performance and effectuality. Motivating the employees has caught the interest and attention of the research workers, leaders of business, and the HR managers. There are a lot of presented selective information about the motivation theory and how this theory can influence the works of the workers. Therefore, the motivation can extensively modify the work’s nature of every worker and can completely revolutionize the organization. However, there are many advantages that a workplace can understand in the purpose about the theory of motivation.
Background
Employee is very important and key element in success of any organisation. No any organisation can achieved their goals devoid of commitment and dedication and struggle from its workers. Organisations frequently try to make happy and convince its employees to attain their loyalty and dedication (Marsick, & Watkins, 2003). Although, it’s all not very simple for any organisation to be fortunate in making people gratified due to every individual effort for an extensive range of various reasons, some people want object success whereas other people might emphasize challenging of job. From a person point of view, satisfaction of job might be very attractive outcomes that workers could achieve. From a practical administrative and organisation effectuality standpoint, it is also very significant to understand how to assess the job satisfaction level and how it relates to different variables of organization. Many analysis shows that job satisfaction might not essential lead to performance of an individual but does also head to the improvement of organisational-level. The interest on the organisations’ efforts to observe different aspects that promote better satisfaction for job and also that will create constructive thought to the organisation has been covered. (Marsick, & Watkins, 2003)
Objectives of the research
The purpose of the motivation theories and finding worth of these theories in any organization is primary objective of the research. Other, is to realise the different effects that it might provide in the efficiency of the workers.
Research Question
The analysis realises the different difficulties and troubles in the working of employees. So, there are a lot of questions which are adhered in the motivation’s issue and its influences on the workers.
1. What are the different actions should be execute by leaders to developing and enhancing the employees’ performances within the workplace?
2. What are the plans and strategies as well as different programs made by the human resources managers to improve and enhance the performance of the employees?
3. What are the employees’ perceptions about the different programs of motivation?
Literature Review
Commitment of companies can be defined as a multidimensional work approach that relates the bond between the staffs and their companies. Actually, it is the situation of trust in and reception of organizational aims, a motivation to exert attempt for the company and a wish to stay with the company. Organizational commitment demonstrates constructive feelings about the company and its policies (Samad, 2007). Generally calculating commitment of company is a review of the similarity between an individual beliefs and values of staff and those of the company. Enhanced organizational commitment has been completely connected with important organizational results, comprising work performance ratings, reduced intention to look for latest works and decreased turnover.
Different people have participated their research results from organizational set ups, to enhance job satisfaction of staff and have presented different proposals to improve the contentment. Ololube (2005), defined to enhance satisfaction level staff and staffs must be presented chances of development. In the same way modifications in organizational variables, like pay scales, staff input in policy improvement, and work situation could then be prepared in an attempt to enhance overall outcome and organizational commitment. Elton Mayo discovered that communication within the group is the excellent satisfier. Protection, connection to work and achievement are pursued through inter group connections. Mosadeghard (2000) presented dimensions of Job satisfaction like style of the work, supervision and management, requirement of task, co-staffs, work security, and promotion and identification had additional impact on organizational commitment of staffs in organizational set up. Profit-sharing and pensions plans are optimistically connected with work satisfaction. Ololube, (2005) defined that one would be incorrect to think one single action of work satisfaction and there can different motives that must be supposed. He additionally discovered that real work was the important satisfier and working situations were the slightest satisfier; security of job was also great determinant of work satisfaction. McKenna, (2000) described that prospect for expert improvement is the greatest determinant to distinguish pleased and non-satisfied staffs. A staff will be pleased if he has reached the targets in his career; he will improve constructive feelings about his career.
Motivational programs recommend that different concerned persons should be work in various situations. Some are based on motivation on their need and for a time they relied on the heavy pressure and stress obtain from the environment of the working (McKenna, 2000). Frequently, they commit to perform a specific job because they desire to shine and increase their value. Usually, the practice or the activities of such workers might be the symbol of their traditions. Motivations can provide the excitement, control, self-confidence and interest that in return appeared in improved performance, determination and originality. If this motivational theory is utilised constantly, surely that all the employees will achieve their goals in the respectful job. This theory is mainly utilised in the organization that can make the employees’ performance. The communication of the workers with others and their environment of working is a vast advantage to use the motivation. In the continuing use this great approach, people get very constructive outcome in fulfilling a great performance. Initially, satisfaction and gratification must be met to understand the improvement and enhancement in the job (McKenna, 2000).
Satisfaction denotes responding the basic requirements of the employees; every organisation should develop various strategies and policies (Dessler, 2001). A performance of an employee is found by the two major aspects, first, the value placed to get the result and other the level of the effort and struggle. Satisfaction creates many exciting ideas about the motivation and the job interest of the worker. Since the requirements are met, the workers are gratified and can make a good and happy frame of mind which many organisations needs to measure and examine as the workers can be changed in to very creative and constructive employees. The employees’ commitment is the struggle to have manages in which the whole firm has an authority and influence in their job works (Hancock, 2004). The significance of the job interest can also enlarge the satisfaction and performance of the job for the reason that when a worker is appropriately fits his academic background on the type of job; there is a very important outcome on the procedure of performing the precise job works. Firms should shape their workers believe that their existence in that firm is valuable. Their connections with the organisation are the significant factor in identifying the whole output. This great accomplishment can be in the technique where the requirements are fulfilled like their self-pride need and self-confidence, recognition or admiration, the wellbeing and safety of the worker (Ladebo, 2005).
In examining the literature, if we wish to define the common meaning of job satisfaction then It will be too hard. Many scholars described the job satisfaction in various ways. Such as, according to Hoppock, he defined, “any collection of psychological, ecological and physiological conditions that resulted an individual frankly to state, ‘I am really very satisfied with my job’ (Green, 2000). In accordance to Donnelly, job satisfaction was “the constructive and favourable point of view of the employee toward the role of work he currently occupies” (Dessler, 2001). According to Smith, Kendall, he believed that “emotions or affective reactions to facets of the circumstances”. Though there was no any unanimity on the tracks of defining it, usually, the job satisfaction was viewed to be the attitude of an employee regarding his/her job based on aspects show in the workplace. Put differently, the things those are involved to facilitate job such things considered as significant.
The behaviour of the Employees would be looked to affect organisational performances and functions in accordance to the workers’ satisfaction or dissatisfaction level about the job. A very powerful connection between organisational dedication and job satisfaction has been observed over many years whereas the results of individual job dissatisfaction in actions or performances harmful to the firm like tardiness, non-attendance, turnover, accidents and strikes. A fragile-to-modest unconstructive connection between revenue and job satisfaction has been exhibited through a few studies (Samad, 2007). High satisfaction about the job will not retain revenue short, but it does give the impression to assist. Conversely, if there is substantial dissatisfaction of it does seem to help, there is probable to be very high turnover. Apparently, different other organisational variables effect the decisions of employee to quit besides job satisfaction. Such organisational variables are age, environmental constraints, responsibilities of family, poor financial situations, and very expert skills and abilities, such as, many cannot detect a fresh job or struggle not to alter a work, thus they stay despite of how displeased they are. Though workers are satisfied and pleased, various are thinking to find the enhanced and well opportunities at different other firms (Samad, 2007). However, it is fact that the job satisfaction is very significant to worker turnover. The rate of low turnover is generally pleasing and attractable to the firm due to the employment and preparation costs and the disadvantages of immaturity in business. As well, workers who are pleased with their working conditions are less expected to be absent than workers who are displeased. Moreover, it is also very significant to realise that though greatest job satisfaction will not compulsory outcome in low absence, low job satisfaction is very possible to increase rate of absenteeism. Nonattendance is affected not through job satisfaction as well as through, such as, pressure or without any pressure to attend.
Several researchers and analysts have observed that various variables are connected optimistically to job satisfaction whereas other variables are the sign of job dissatisfaction r displeasure. A re-examine of the literature shows that many analyses have strongly concentrated on factors to relate with work and personal variables. These personal variables contain different factors like age, sexual category, and education background. The connection between job satisfaction and age adheres to be a function of U-shaped where the job satisfaction with employees who are youngsters is firstly high and after that falls for many years, and lastly raises another time with workers age. Old age persons look like to be usually more pleased with the jobs than a young person. Though, in 1990, Rice observed that the age of people was not associated to job satisfaction. Whereas study on the connection between job satisfaction and sexual category (gender) also was imprecise, in 1976, Gemmell and Hollen compared the levels of job satisfaction of community-college lecturers found that males show greater levels of job satisfaction than females. By the analysis of job satisfaction at NIDA’s faculty members, Sagol Jariyavidyanont (1978), observed no important dissimilarities in those faculty’s job satisfaction amongst age, gender, working experiences and education.
A literature review that contained there is relation between education and job satisfaction and education can be unconstructive or constructive. Such as, according to Elbert and Carrel in 1974, both observed the negative or unconstructive connection between job satisfaction and education. Both agreed that the workers, who have very best education level, are dissatisfied and displeased with doing the regular duties necessary in almost every job. In contrast, in accordance to Baldi de Mandilovitch, in 1980 observed the connection between educational level and job satisfaction has constructive and positive connection. Many factors and aspects relate to work were also observed to affect the job satisfaction. The work or job itself contributes a very important part in deciding how workers are pleased with the working conditions in the organisation. Workers tend to preference the more challenging and thought-provoking jobs that allow them use their capabilities as well as embody a variety of different objectives, liberty, and performance opinion as a feedback (Arnold and Feldman, 1986). In 1976, Locke observed that the appealing and demanding of the job itself guided to the greater job satisfaction’s level. Having supportive colleagues is a very modest and clear way of job satisfaction. In accordance to Ducharme and Martin, their observations indicated that affective colleagues support extensively increase and improve the job satisfaction of employee.
Good wages could be the very significant job satisfaction factors due to it greatly assist to accomplish almost all needs of worker in which worker’s fundamental as well as high-level requirements. They frequently see wages in the context of how the company and its management examine their best effort to the company. As well, fringe advantages give to job satisfaction, but would not be as prominent as wages. In accordance to Schneider and Derlin (1994) said that analysts in various researches have agreed that benefits of wage and fringe are the vital and major variable to be viewed in the job satisfaction study (Waskiewicz, 1999). Opportunity for development and improvement appears to have a changing effect on job satisfaction. It is due to opportunity for development and improvement takes various kinds and has a range of associated rewards. An optimistic atmosphere and chances to develop in an intellectual manners and enhanced the base of abilities has become very vital than opportunities of customary promotion. Workers who are provided great opportunities to find out to extend their information, awareness and advance their skills and abilities are more pleased with the works. Quality and techniques of management also contribute a major part in job satisfaction. Various analysis exhibited that attitude of employees was straight related with management quality facilitated to employees. From the perspective of organisational interaction, according to Brunetto (2002), he observed that there is a constructive connection between the organisational interaction and commitment by the employee with job satisfaction (Waldman, 2007).
Job satisfaction is considered to an individual’s emotions or attitude about their work’s nature. Satisfaction can be affected through a range of different factors, such as practice of pay, quality of an individual’s connection with the manager, physical environment’s quality wherein they perform the job through which turnover cites to the trait of a given firm or business, relative to benefit or lose rate at which a company expands and loses employees (Waldman, 2007). Such as, if a company or its owner is stated to have a great turnover, it indicates that workers of the firm have a low tenure than employees of different other firms in that similar business. Basically, both turnover and satisfaction are connected by which job satisfaction has clearly effect on the turnover. Huge literatures present on the connections between two main organisational variables as noted.
Hazel among Mion and Pierce (1996) study the result of a model known as” professional practice model (PPM)” on turnover and job satisfaction of nurses. They apply the PPM’s implementation as the attributes of participating judgment making; control on practices of work; collegial connections; open, multilevel interaction; rewards and organizational supportiveness related to clinical expertise. The main outcomes of the research establish the extensively correlated with improved and enhances job satisfaction and inferior rates of turnover among employees (nurses) in rehabilitation hospital. Actually, consequently of their research provide an idea regarding the present connection between turnover and satisfaction (Waldman, 2007).
Organizational effectuality is the notion of how helpful a firm is in obtaining the results the firm intends to generate. Organizational effectuality is a conceptual thought and is fundamentally not possible to assess and determine. Rather than assessing organizational effectuality, the organization decides proxy measures that will be applied to symbolize effectuality (Waldman, 2007). People may comprise these factors as management’s efficiency, employees’ performance, core abilities, number of people functioned, Sizes and kinds of population segments worked and many more. Consequently people strongly focused on the employees’ performance which to what broaden this proxy measure participates in Organizational effectuality.
The performance of employee actually relied on several elements and aspects such as performance assessments, worker motivation, worker satisfaction, reward, guidance and growth, job safety, Organizational structure and different other factors, but the main sector of analysis is strongly concentrated only on these major aspects in which Employee Motivation and Organizational Structure, such aspects greatly influence the employees’ performance.
In accordance to Kreitner (1995), he stated that the psychological method that provides the direction and function of behaviour. In accordance to Buford, Lindner and Bedeian (1995), they said that a predisposition to act in a purposeful way to attain precise and particular, unmet requirements.
Getting workers to perform their better work at workplace, even in attempting situations, are the most greasy and enduring challenges for managers. Really, decoding what motivates people as humans is a very old mystery. A number of most leading thinkers of history about behaviour of human being, among these great thinkers Adam Smith, Abraham Maslow, Sigmund Freud and Aristotle, have effort to realize its nuances.
Maslow hierarchy of need (1943) described five main levels about the needs of employee, physiological, ego, social, security, and self-actualizing. In accordance to Masclow, he stated that poorer level needs had to be pleased previous to the next need of advanced level would encourage workers. According to Herzberg (1959), he divided motivation in two aspects: motivators and hygienic. Motivator or in two parts, like recognition and success, create job satisfaction. Hygiene or extrinsic aspects, like wages and safety and security of job, generate job dissatisfaction or displeasure.
Methodology
Area of selection
Aforesaid study indicated that different researches exhibit the influence of the performance of employee on organizational effectuality. This research is being delivered in various places of UK strongly based upon different assessments. Four cities are major places for studying the organizational effectuality with consider to performance of employees, their motivation and organizational atmosphere.
Research Instrument
Followed questionnaire is applied as a main instrument of research. This instrument applies 5-point linker degree from: 1-no agree 2-powerfull opposite, 3- neutral, 4- agree, 5- hundred percent agree. Such questionnaires are managed to workers in different settings of organization in UK four main cities. This questionnaire provides significance to all such aspects linking to organizational effectuality. Such questionnaires exhibit the employees’ views about these questions. Such questionnaires contained 21 questions additional by few individual questions (McKenna, 2000). These are all link to performance of employee, to employee motivation, 3 to administrative proficiency, 1 to creative synergy, 2 to multiple racial and cultural conflicts. By merging all the questions the research empowers to take a thoroughly view of any organization and its rules.
This great study is completed in non designed settings due to natural atmosphere is preferred to evaluate the employees of organization. Information is gathered only one time so the research is relied on cross-section study.
Sample
This research applied the likelihood sampling and it is more divided into simple random sampling as the research variables have the similar option of being chosen and the style is generalized. Sample is based on the entire population and this sample size covers banking sector and telecommunication in UK (Ololube, 2005).
Reliability of Measure
Measurement scale in this research assessed through the questionnaire used 1988 by Donald Clark. One more source which is pitched in and supportive for measurement is J.K White and R.R Ruh (1973) ?Effect of personal values on connection between contribution and job attitudes all the measures applied in this research are defining an important reliability (Ololube, 2005).
Possible Result
There is aggressive situation among all organizations and they effort to handle its cost and attempt to retain its important staffs. Under these situations organizations advantage through concentrating on the aspects that certainly affect staff motivation. This study will define that management can use various plans to inspire staffs, but it is essential that managers remember that various plans would have a particular motivational affect on various staffs. Companies are constantly attempting to improve such a pay procedures and policies that will allow them to motivate, attract, sustain and please their employees. Results of this research will be an excellent method which could be applied to present answers to individual complications that has ensued from deprived system of reward. The data are actually subjected to the main components factor assessment to observe the reliability and validity of the different aspects related in this research. This research concentrated on staff performance, staff motivation and organizational effectiveness. Staff performance has a constructive relation with organizational efficiency and staff inspiration has also optimistic connection with organizational efficiency. A relation is there among these variables but excellent relationship does not exist.
ReferencesDessler, G. (2001). Management: Leading People and Organization in the 21st Century. Harlow: Prentice Hall.
Ladebo, O. J. (2005). Effects of Work-related Attitudes on the Intention to Leave the Profession:
An Examination of School Teachers in Nigeria. Educational Management Administration
& Leadership, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 355-369
McKenna, E, F. (2000). Business Psychology and Organisational Behaviour: A Student’s
Handbook. Hove: Psychology Press
Ololube, N. P. (2005). Benchmarking the Motivational Competencies of Academically Qualified
Teachers and Professionally Qualified Teachers in Nigerian Secondary Schools. The
African Symposium, Vol. 5, No. 3. pp. 17-37
Hancock, D. (2004). Cooperative learning and peer orientation effects on motivation achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 97 (3).
Gliem, J. A. (2005). Applied multivariate statistical analysis. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Copy Center.
Marsick, V. J. & Watkins, K. E. (2003). Demonstrating the value of an organization’s learning culture: The dimensions of the learning organization questionnaire. Advances in Developing Human Resources. Vol. 5.
Samad, S. 2007. Assessing the Effects of Job Satisfaction and Psychological Contract
on Organizational Commitment among Employees in Malaysian SMEs. The 4th
SMEs IN A Global Economy Conference 2007
Waldman, M. 2007. Handbook of Organizational Economics. Ithaca, New York:
Johnson Graduate School of Management.
