The purpose of the Supreme Court is to be the main analyst of the United States Constitution. The Supreme Court also makes decisions on federal statutes.
The Supreme Court is the final higher court to appeal to when cases have not been able to be resolved through previous court proceedings. The Supreme Court has a high regard for power and impact on numerous major legal, political, and social issues in the country. The Supreme Court is actually the highest court of appeals.There are nine justices, including a chief justice, the president appoints them and they hold their position for life. This means that they are justices for the remainder of their lives unless unable to do so.
In most cases where a justice has to step down from their position it is usually health related. When the Supreme Court reviews cases, it does not mean that the court will hear the case. Due to so many cases, presented to the Supreme Court the panel of nine judges must review the cases and then four out of the nine have to agree to the cases they will further review.Cases that the Supreme Court hears are cases that involve legal questions regarding the constitution or matters of federal law. The Supreme Court looks more at cases that require a more in depth look at constitutional rights in the new era. The Supreme Court also takes interest in request made to help solve conflicting outcomes for crimes committed in different jurisdictions that offer different verdicts.
After the nine judges hear the contents of a case, they retire to a private room where they discuss the facts of the case to make a decision.The Supreme Court justices generally meet on Tuesdays and Fridays to discuss and come to a verdict about a case. The justices are the only people present in the room during the discussion and decision process. During this process they also discussion new motions or petitions. The newest member of the justices will often take notes as needed and send for any information or documents the justices might need. Once they have reached a conclusion the elder justice of the majority is in charge of who will be responsible for choosing who will write the courts judgment.
In addition, the most senior justice for the minority section will choose the difference of opinion writer. In various cases, individual justices decide to include their own assertion detailing why they voted for either position or articulate their discrepancies with the way the majority opinion was written. In the end all that matters is the opinion of the majority that will symbolize the court’s decision. On some occasions, the justices may be called to be involved in other business matters while opinions are pounded out.
This can lengthen the process for coming to a conclusion. There are no time limitations set for the Supreme Court to come to their decision in that aspect they are able to mull over the information for as long as it takes to reach their verdict, which could take months. In these proceedings, there can be some issues among the justices for the way one another interpret the information. A court opinion may be rewritten many times before the majority gains all the voters needed to come to a firm conclusion.Persuasion is often a participant in the proceedings when trying to win the votes needed to conclude. In conclusion, the decision is put on paper, printed, and released prior to anyone knowing.
Once on paper the court’s reporter will write a summary of the decision released to the public. Once this is all completed, the justices will appear for a short explanation of their decision. In some instances, they will read excerpts from the court’s opinion. Concluding the court’s decision makes it official and there is no higher court to appeal to so there is no way to get a different outcome.The discretional powers of the Supreme Court are as follows but not complete. The main power of the Supreme Court justices is having the right to choose what cases will merit being heard.
They also have the power to use their own judgment to make decisions when it comes to the cases being mauled over. Their discretionary powers allow them to rule whether or not the rights of a person were violated. In the event that the justices feel the persons rights were violated they will then review the case and make a decision, which the lower court will have to concede.The importance of the discretionary powers of the Supreme Court is that it allows for those that have their rights trampled upon some justice. More importantly, it gives them the power to make changes when they are needed to the way laws are upheld. The affect their discretionary powers have on the law is substantial due to their ability to make the significant changes to increase structure to the way the constitution is interpreted.
The affect it has on the citizens can be good or bad depending on the outcome of the case.If there are positive changes made due to some injustice then this will have a greater impact on the citizens in an encouraging way. However, if the outcome is negative then the citizens do not gain anything from the whole process. The positives and negatives of these discretional powers vary depending on how people perceive what has happen in a case and the outcome. A positive for these powers are that many needed changes to the way things are handled during a case will happen.
A negative would be that a change could do more harm than good.Another positive is that laws that are more important can derive from the proceedings. Resulting in a better understanding of how the constitution should be recognized and upheld differently from the day they were first written. Considering the amount of cases heard during the Supreme Courts sessions I believe that they should remain the same.
As they have been able to make good decisions thus far in history. Although, change is never bad so giving them a little more structure could help them perceive things in a different light.
