How useful are sources ‘D’ & ‘E’ in helping us to understand

The author of Source 'E' is useful to us as Malcolm X is a Black American against Martin Luther King. This source is also useful as it is Malcolm X's autobiography so that means that it could be a primary source however, the date on which the source was published makes it a secondary source because it was written seven years after M.L.

K.'s high, the march on Birmingham in 1963. The fact that the source has been written seven years after the height of M.L.K.

's career also affects the usefulness of the source because in these seven years Martin Luther King's methods could have changed.There could be a number of different purposes for this source. As it is Malcolm X's autobiography, it could be to entertain so that he will earn many monies. It could be to persuade as he may be targeting other Black Americans to try to change their opinions on M.L.

K. It could also be to inform the Black American community of what Martin Luther King is actually trying to do and what will happen if they keep following his methods.The content of this source is partly useful as he does talk about segregation from whites and from this point, we can infer that he does not want to forgive white people for what they and their forefathers have done. I know this because he quotes 'Even though they appeared to have opened the door, it was still closed.

What Malcolm X means by this is that de jure, in 1954 black children were allowed in white schools but by de facto there were still only 0.1% of black children integrated by 1963, nine years after the law had stated all schools must be integrated this is because the states were told to do this with all necessary speed. In contrast, the source does not tell us about doing these things the illegal way or with violence. These factors make this source not totally reliable as it only talks about not integrating with the white society and not forgiving them.

The tone of the source is mainly exaggerated, as Malcolm X was a political opponent of Martin Luther King. This therefore makes the source unreliable, as it is only to do with down grading M.L.K.

's way of integration between both societies.Overall, this source is only partially useful, as it does not really help us understand why some Black Americans rejected the methods of Martin Luther King. This is mainly because the source only talks about one of the factors in M.L.K.

's method, integration, and why Malcolm X rejected it.The origin of source 'D' is partly useful as the source was written by Martin Luther King and he himself may have actually understood why some Black Americans rejected him. The date however, does not make this source useful as it was written before the height of his career. This meant that by 1963 his methods could have changed and he could have a lot more supporters.The purpose of this source is mostly to persuade as it from a magazine called 'Liberation'. Martin Luther King tries to persuade fellow Black Americans that if they do things the legal way they will gain support.

He also tries to persuade them that violence is not the way.The context of the source is quite useful to us as it does tell us that some Black Americans were using violence because otherwise Martin Luther King would just be writing about things that are not affecting anyone. However, the fact that he says 'But if he seeks it and organises it, he cannot win.' shows that violence was present during 1959.

What Martin Luther King is trying to get across here is that some Black Americans were using violence and they should stop, as it will get them nowhere. We also learn that from the quote that people are using violence and rejecting his methods but we still do not know why they did this, as it does not mention anything about their reasons against M.L.K.

The tone of this source is emotional as well as being factual. It is emotional as he talks in a way that people will start to get people to think about how his methods work and what they will gain if they support him. The tone is also quite factual as it is also trying to say in a sly way that people should stop the violence, as that is what is happening de facto.Overall, I would say that this source is only partly useful as it only tells us that there was violence but not the reasons for it and doing things the legal way.