The query regarding the assertion that democracies do not fight each other often talks about the same old things, particularly in the debatable definitions of democracy. Despite this, there is actually a theoretical analysis on why this statement may possibly hold. Therefore, the statement that says, democracies do not fight each other, may be asserted because of the characteristic and nature that democracy has against war.Democracies Never Fight Each OtherIn the international arena, theorists have always been debating on the reality on whether or not democracies do not fight one another.
The debate on this topic usually revolves around the same things. One side will propose that democracies never fight, while the other side gives examples of democratic countries fighting. This will be followed by an argument that those countries are not democratic countries paving the way to another heated debate on whether or not a country is a democratic one or not. This all ends with the discussion on what is a democracy.
There are those who strongly believe that this statement will be supported by the norms and political structures of a state (Gelpi & Griesdorf 2001, pp. 633 – 647). But the more accurate discussion must be centered upon the question, why do democracies “theoretically” do not fight each other? The proponents of this idea concentrate on the nature and characteristic of any democratic state. First of all, some believe that a democratic culture tends to foster negotiation and compromise as the primary way for leaders to deal with other states (Russet 1993, pp. 5 - 11).
This notion centers upon the belief that the democracies when dealing in the international sphere will prefer international cooperation rather than be in conflict with other democracies. And in turn the other democratic states also foster the same notions in its dealings. Finally, as part of any democratic state, the belief and promulgation of human rights make democratic countries reluctant to go to war (Ravlo & Gleditsch 2000).There will be tendencies and movements that go against any proliferation of the human rights abuses that wars inevitably cause.
The notion and belief in war do not coincide with the essence of human rights which the society holds and values. In essence, democracies have an ideal perception of having anti-war sentiments. The norms and structures that democratic states have possessed and integrated are all leaning towards peaceful solutions and processes that envelop their state and the way it relates with other democratic states.
