income tax 1

WHICH, IF ANY, OF THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS BEST DESCRIBES THE HISTORY OF THE FEDERAL INCOME TAX?

WHICH, IF ANY, IS NOT ONE OF ADAM SMITH'S CANONS OF TAXIATION?

WHICH, IF ANY, OF THE FOLLOWING TAXES ARE PROPORTIONAL (RATHER THAN PROGRESSIVE)?

WHICH, IF ANY, OF THE FOLLOWING TRANSACTIONS WILL INCREASE A TAXING JURISDICTION'S REVENUE FROM THE AD VALOREM TAX IMPOSED ON REAL ESTATE?

WHICH, IF ANY, OF THE FOLLOWING TRANSACTIONS WILL DECREASE A TAXING JURISDICTION'S AD VALOREM TAX REVENUE IMPOSED ON REAL ESTATE?

WHICH, IF ANY, OF THE FOLLOWING IS A TYPICAL CHARACTERISTIC OF AN AD VALOREM TAX ON PERSONALTY?

FEDERAL EXCISE TAXES THAT ARE NO LONGER IMPOSED INCLUDE:

TAXES NOT IMPOSED BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT INCLUDE:

TAXES LEVIED BY BOTH STATES AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT INCLUDE:

TAXES LEVIED BY ALL STATES INCLUDE:

A USE TAX IS IMPOSED BY:

BURT AND LISA ARE MARRIED AND LIVE IN A COMMMON LAW STATE. BURT WANTS TO MAKE GIFTS TO THEIR FIVE CHILDREN IN 2011. WHAT IS THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF THE ANNUAL EXCLUSION THEY WILL BE ALLOWED FOR THESE GIFTS?

PROPERTY CAN BE TRANSFERRED WITHIN THE FAMILY GROUP BY GIFT OR AT DEATH. ONE MOTIVATION FOR PREFERRING THE GIFT APPROACH IS:

INDICATE WHICH, IF ANY, STATEMENT IS INCORRECT. STATE INCOME TAXES:

STATE INCOME TAXES GENERALLY CAN BE CHARACTERIZED BY:

A CHARACTERISTIC OF FICA IS THAT:

A CHARACTERISTIC OF FUTA IS THAT:

THE U.S. (EITHER FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL) DOES NOT IMPOSE:

THE PROPOSED FLAT TAX:

A VAT TAX (VALUE ADDED TAX):

CHARACTERISTICS OF THE "FAIR TAX"(I.E., NATIONAL SALES TAX) INCLUDE WHICH, IF ANY, OF THE FOLLOWING:

IN TERMS OF PROBABLILTY, WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING TAXPAYERS WOULD BE LEAST LIKELY TO BE AUDITED BY THE IRS?

WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING IS A CHARACTERISTIC OF THE AUDIT PROCESS?

SCOTT FILES HIS TAX RETURN 65 DAYS AFTER THE DUE DATE. ALONG WITH THE RETURN, SCOTT REMITS A CHECK FOR $50,000 WHICH IS THE BALANCE OF THE TAX OWED. DISREGARDING THE INTEREST ELEMENT, SCOTT'S TOTAL FAILURE TO FILE AND TO PAY PENALTIES ARE:

A CHARACTERISTIC OF THE FRAUD PENALTIES IS:

REGARDING PROPER ETHICAL GUIDLINES, WHICH (IF ANY) OF THE FOLLOWING IS CORRECT?

BOTH ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL CONSIDERATIONS CAN BE USED TO JUSTIFY:

SOCIAL CONSIDERATIONS CAN BE USED TO JUSTIFY:

ALLOWING A DOMESTIC PRODUCTION ACTIVITIES DEDUCTION FOR CERTAIN MANUFACTURING INCOME CAN BE JUSTIFIED:

PROVISIONS IN THE TAX LAW THAT PROMOTE ENERGY CONSERVATION AND MORE USE OF ALTERNATIVE (NON FOSSIL) FUELS CAN BE JUSTIFIED BY:

WHICH, IF ANY, OF THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS CANNOT BE JUSTIFIED AS MITIGAGING THE EFFECT OF THE ANNUAL ACCOUNTING PERIOD CONCEPT?

WHICH, IF ANY, OF THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS OF THE TAX LAW CANNOT BE JUSTIFIED AS PROMOTING ADMINISTRATIVE FEASIBILITY (SIMMPLIFYING THE TASK OF THE IRS)?

A LANDLORD LEASES PROPERTY UPON WHICH THE TENANTY MAKES IMPROVEMENTS. THE IMPROVEMENTS ARE SIGNIFICANT AND ARE NOT MADE IN LIEU OF RENT. AT THE END OF THE LEASE, THE VALUE OF THE IMPROVEMENTS ARE NOT INCOME TO THE LANDLORD. THIS RULE IS AN EXAMPLE OF:

THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE WAS CODIFIED IN WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING YEARS?

TAX BILLS ARE HANDLED BY WHICH COMMITTEE IN THE U.S. SENATE?

WHICH COMMITTEE RECONCILES THE TAX BILLS BETWEEN THE SENATE AND THE HOUSE?

SUBCHAPTER S COVERS WHICH SPECIFIED AREA OF TAX LAW?

WHICH IS NOT A CODE SECTION NUMBER

WHICH STATEMENT IS FALSE WITH RESPECT TO TAX TREATIES?

WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING IS NOT AN ADMINISTRATIVE SOURCE OF THE TAX LAW?

WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING SOURCES HAS THE HIGHEST TAX VALIDITY?

WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING TYPES OF REGULATIONS HAS THE HIGHEST TAX VALIDITY?

WHAT STATEMENT IS NOT TRUE WITH RESPECT TO A REGULATION WHICH INTERPRETS THE TAX LAW?

IN ASSESSING THE IMPORTANCE OF A REGULATION, AN IRS AGENT MUST:

WHICH ITEM MAY NOT BE CITED AS A PRECEDENT?

WHAT STATEMENT IS NOT TRUE WITH RESPECT TO TEMPORARY REGULATIONS?

WHICH COURT DECISIONS ARE PUBLISHED IN PAPER FORMAT BY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT?

WHICH WOULD NOT BE A CITATION TO A DISTRICT COURT CASE?

WHICH TAX SOURCE MEY OVERRIDE A REGULATION SECTION?

WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING JOURNALS IS PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CPA'S?

WHERE CAN A RESEARCHER NOT FIND A U.S. COURT OF APPEALS DECISION?

WHICH PUBLISHER OFFERS TAX CENTER THAT PROVIDES THE CODE, REGULATIONS AND MATERIAL FROM MATTHEW BENDER CCH, KLEINROCK, AND THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFIARS?

WHICH PUBLISHER OFFERS THE STANDARD FEDERAL TAX REPORTER?

WHICH IS PRESENTLY NOT A MAJOR TAX SERVICE?

WHICH PUBLISHER OFFERS THE UNITED STATES TAX REPORTER?

WHEN SEARCHING ON AN ONLINE TAX SERVICE, WHICH APPROACH IS MORE FREQUENTLY USED?

A RESEARCHER CAN FIND TAX INFORMATION ON HOME PAGE SITES OF:

TAX RESEARCH INVOLVES WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURES:

WHICH TAX RELATED WEBSITE PROBABLY GIVES THE BEST POLICY-ORIENTED RESULTS?

WHICH COURT DECISION WOULD PROBABLY CARRY MORE WEIGHT?

WHICH REGULATIONS HAVE THE FORCE AND EFFECT OF LAW?

WHICH ITEMS TELL TAXPAYERS THE IRS'S REACTION TO CERTAIN COURT DECISIONS?

WHICH COURT DECISION CARRIES LESS WEIGHT?

WHICH COMPANY DOES NOT PUBLISH CITATORS FOR TAX PURPOSES?

WHICH IS NOT A PRIMARY SOURCE OF TAX LAW?

WHICH STATEMENT IS INCORRECT WITH RESPECT TO TAXATION ON THE CPA EXAM?

IN TERMS OF THE TAX FORMULA APPLICABLE TO INDIVIDUAL TAXPAYERS, WHICH IF ANY, OF THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS IS CORRECT?

REGARDING THE TAX FORMULA AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO FORM 1040, WHICH IF ANY, OF THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS IS CORRECT?

WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS, IF ANY, IS DEDUCTIBLE?

WHICH, IF ANY, OF THE FOLLOWING IS A DEDUCTION FOR AGI?

WHICH, IF ANY, OF THE FOLLOWING IS A DEDUCTION FOR AGI?

WHICH, IF ANY, OF THE STATEMENTS REGARDING THE STANDARD DEDUCTION IS CORRECT?

WHICH, IF ANY, OF THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS RELATING TO THE STANDARD DEDUCTION IS CORRECT?

DURING 2011, ESTHER HAD THE FOLLOWING TRANSACTIONS: SALARY- $50,000 BANK LOAN- 10,000 ALIMONY RECIEVED- 6,000 CHILD SUPPORT RECIEVED- 12,000 GIFT FROM AUNT- 20,000 ESTHER'S AGI IS:

DURING 2011, MARVIN HAD THE FOLLOWING TRANSACTIONS: SALARY- $70,000 INTEREST INCOME ON CITY OF DENVER BONDS- 2,000 INHERITANCE FROM UNCLE- 40,000 CONTRIBUTION TO TRADITIONAL IRA- 5,000 CAPITAL LOSSES- 3,000 MARVIN'S AGI IS:

DURING 2011, ANNA HAD THE FOLLOWING TRANSACTIONS: SALARY- $80,000 INTEREST INCOME ONN IBM BONDS- 2,000 DAMAGES FOR PERSONAL INJURY (CAR ACCIDENT)- 100,000 PUNITIBE DAMAGES(SAME CAR ACCIDENT)- 200,000 CASH DIVIDENDS FROM CHEVRON CORPORATION STOCK- 5,000 ANNA'S AGI IS:

IN 2011, JUSTIN HAD THE FOLLOWING TRANSACTIONS: SALARY- $90,000 CAPITAL LOSS FROM A STOCK INVESTMENT- (4,000) MOVING EXPENSES TO CHG JOBS- (11,000) RECIEVED REPAYMENT OF A $20,000 LOAN SHE MADE TO HER BROTHER IN 2006- $20,000 STATE INCOME TAXES- (5,000) JUSTIN'S AGI IS:

SYLVIA, AGE 17, IS CLAIMED BY HER PARENTS AS A DEPENDENT. DURING 2011, SHE HAD INTEREST INCOME FROM A BANK SAVINGS ACCOUNT OF $2,000 AND INCOME FROMM A PART TIME JOB OF $4,200. SYLVIA'S TAXABLE INCOMME IS:

TONY, AGE 15, IS CLAIMED AS A DEPENDENT BY HIS GRANDMOTHER. DURING 2011, TONY HAD INTEREST INCOME FROM BOEING CORPORATION BONDS OF $1,000 AND EARNINGS FROM A PART-TIME JOB OF $700. TONY'S TAXABLE INCOME IS:

MERLE IS A WIDOW, AGE 80 AND BLIND, WHO IS CLAIMED AS A DEPENDENT BY HER SON. DURING 2011, SHE RECEIVED $4,800 IN SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS, $2,200 IN BANK INTEREST, AND $1,800 IN CASH DIVIDENDS FROM STOCKS. MERLE'S TAXABLE INCOME IS:

WILMA, AGE 70 AND SINGLE, IS CLAIMED AS A DEPENDENT ON HER DAUGHTER'S TAX RETURN. DURING 2011, SHE HAD INTEREST INCOME OF $2,400 AND $800 OF EARNED INCOME FROM BABY SITTING. WILMA'S TAXABLE INCOME IS:

KYLE AND LIZA ARE MARRIED AND UNDER AGE 65. DURING 2011, THEY FURNISH MORE THAT HALF OF THE SUPPRT TO THEIR 18 YR OLD DAUGHTER, MAY, WHO LIVES WITH THEM. MAY EARNS $15,000 FROM A PART TIME JOB, MOST OF WHICH SHE SETS ASIDE FOR FUTURE COLLEGE EXPENSES. KYLE AND LIZA ALSO PROVIDE MORE THAN HALF OF THE SUPPORT OF KYLE'S COUSIN WHO LIVES WITH THEM. LIZA'S FATHER, WHO DIED ON JANUARY 3RD, 2011, AT AGE 90, HAS FOR MANY YEARS QUALIFIED AS THEIR DEPENDENT. HOW MANY PERSONAL ANDDEPENDENCY EXEMPTIONS SHOULD KYLE AND LIZA CLAIM?

IN WHICH, IF ANY, OF THE FOLLOWING SITUATIONS MAY THE INDIVIDUAL NOT BE CLAIMED AS A DEPENDENT OF THE TAXPAYER?

DURING 2011, JEN (AGE 66) FURNISHED MORE THAT 50% OF THE SUPPORT OF THE FOLLOWING PERSONS: JEN'S SCURRENT HUSBAND WHO HAS NO INCOME AND IS NOT CLAIMED BY SOMEONE ELSE AS A DEPENDENT. JEN'S STEPSON (AGE 18) WHO LIVES WITH HER AND EARNS $6,000 AS A DANCE INSTRUCTOR. HE DROPPED OUT OF SCHOOL A YEAR AGO. JEN'S EX-HUSBAND WHO DOES NOT LIVE WITH HER. THE DIVORCE OCCURED TWO YEARS AGO. JEN'S FORMER BROTHER-IN-LAW WHO DOES NOT LIVE WITH HER. PRESUMING ALL OTHER DEPENDENCY TEST ARE MET ON SEPERATE RETURN HOW MANY PERSONAL AND DEPENDENCY EXEMPTIONS MAY JEN CLAIM?

A QUALIFYING CHILD CANNOT INCLUDE:

ELLEN, AGE 12, LIVES IN THE SAME HOUSEHOLD AS HER FATHER, GRANDFATHER, AND UNCLE. THE COST OF MAINTAINING THE HOUSEHOLD IS PROVIDED BY HER GRANDFATHER (40%) AND HER UNCLE (60%). DISREGARDING TIE-BREAKER RULES, ELLEN IS A QUALIFYING CHILD AS TO:

MILLIE, AGE 80, IS SUPPORTED DURING THE CURRENT YEAR AS FOLLOWS: WESTON (A SON)- 10% FAITH (A DAUGHTER)- 35% JAKE (A COUSIN)- 35% BRAYDEN (UNRELATED CLOSE FAMILY FRIEND) - 20% DURING THE YEAR, MILLIE LIVES IN AN ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY. UNDER A MULTIPLE SUPPORT AGREEMENT, INDICATE WHICH PARTIES CAN QUALIFY TO CLAIM MILLIE AS A DEPENDENT.

THE HUTTERS FILED A JOINT RETURN FOR 2011. THEY PROVIDE MORE THAN 50% OF THE SUPPORT OF CARLA, MELVIN, AND AARON. CARLA (AGE 20) IS A COUSIN AND EARNS $3,000 FROM A PART TIME JOB. MELVIN (AGE 25) IS THEIR SON AND IS A FULL-TIME LAW STUDENT. HE RECEIVED FROMM THE UNIVERSITY 3,800 SCHOLARSHIP FOR TUITION. AARON IS A BROTHER WHO IS A CITIZEN OF ISRAEL BUT RESIDES IN FRANCE. CARLA AND MELVIN LIVE WITH THE HUTTERS. HOW MANY PERSONAL AND DEPENDENCY EXEMPTIONS CAN THE HUTTERS CLAIM ON THEIR FEDERAL INCOME TAX RETURN?

FOR THE QUALIFYING RELATIVE RULE (FOR DEPENDENCY EXEMPTION PURPOSES):

KYLE, WHOSE WIFE DIED IN DECEMBER 2008, FILED A JOINT TAX RETURN FOR 2008. HE DID NOT REMARRY, BUT HAS CONTINUED TO MAINTAIN HIS HOME IN WHICH HIS TWO DEPENDENT CHILDREN LIVE. WHAT IS KYLE'S FILING STATUS ASS TO 2011?

EMILY, WHOSE HUSBAND DIED IN DECEMBER 2010, MAINTAINS A HOUSEHOLD IN WHICH HER DEPENDENT DAUGHTER LIVES. WHICH (IF ANY) OF THE FOLLOWING IS HER FILING STATUS FOR THE TAX YEAR 2011? (NOTE: EMILY IS THE EXECUTOR OF HER HUSBAND'S ESTATE)

WHICH OF THE FOLLOWINNG TAXPAYERS MAY FILE AS HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD IN 2011? RON PROVIDES ALL THE SUPPORT FOR HIS MOTHER, BETTY, WHO LIVES BY HERSELF IN AN APARMENT IN FORT LAUDERDALE. RON PAYS THE RENT AND OTHER EXPENSES FOR THE APARTMENT AND PROPERLY CLAIMS HIS MOTHER AS A DEPENDENT. TAMMY PROVIDES OVER ONE-HALF THE SUPPORT FOR HER 18 YR OLD BROTHER, DAN. DAN EARNED $4,200 IN 2011 WORKINNG AT A FAST FOOD RESTAURANT AND IS SAVING HIS MONEY TO ATTEND COLLEGE IN 2012. DAN LIVES IN TAMMY'S HOME. JOE'S WIFE LEFT HIM LATE IN DECEMBER OF 2010. NO LEGAL ACTION WAS TAKEN AND JOE HAS NOT HEARD FROM HER IN 2011. JOE SUPPORTED HIS 6 YR OLD SON, WHO LIVED WITH HIM THROUGHTOUT 2011.

NELDA IS MARRIED TO CHAD, WHO ABANDONED HER IN EARLY JUNE OF 2011. SHE HAS NOT SEEN OR COMMMUNICATED WITH HIM SINCE THEN. SHE MAINTAINS A HOUSEHOLD IN WHICH SHE AND HER TWO DEPENDENT CHILDREN LIVE. WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS ABOUT NELDA'S FILING STATUS IN 2011 IS CORRECT?

ARNOLD IS MARRIED TO SYBIL, WHO ABANDONED HIM IN 2009. HE AHS NOT SEEN OR COMMMUNICATED WITH HER SINCE APRIL OF THAT YEAR. HE MAINTAINS A HOUSEHOLD IN WHICH THEIR SON, EVANS, LIVES. EVANS IS AGE 25 AND EARNS OVER $20,000 EACH YEAR. FOR TAX YEAR 2011, ARNOLD'S FILING STATUS IS:

REGARDING THE TAX TABLES APPLICABLE TO THE FEDERAL INCOME TAX, WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS IS CORRECT?

WHICH, IF ANY, OF THE FOLLWOING IS A CORRECT STATEMENT RELATING TO THE KIDDIE TAX?

DURING THE YEAR, KIM SOLD THE FOLLOWING ASSETS: BUSINESS AUTO FOR A $1,000LOSS, STOCK INVESTMENT FOR A $1,000 LOSS AND PLEASURE YACHT FOR A $1,000 LOSS. PRESUMING ADEQUATE INCOME, HOW MUCH OF THESE LOSSES MAY KIM CLAIM?

PERRY IS IN THE 33% TAX BRACKET. DURING 2011, HE HAD THE FOLLOWING CAPITAL ASSET TRANSACTIONS: GAIN FROM THE SALE OF A STAMP COLLECTION (HELD FOR 10 YEARS)- $30,000 GAIN FROM THE SALE OF AN INVESTMENT IN LAND (HELD FOR 4 YEARS)- $10,000 GAIN FROM THE SALE OF STOCK INVESTMENT (HELD FOR 8 MONTHS)- 4,000 PERRY'S TAX CONSEQUENCES FROM THESE GAINS ARE AS FOLLOWS:

FOR THE CURRENT YEAR, DAVID HAS SALARY INCOME OF $80,000 AND THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY TRANSACTIONS: STOCK INVESTMENT SALES- $9,000 LONG TERM CAPITAL GAIN, SHORT TERM CAPITAL LOSS- (11,000) LOSS ON SALE OF CAMPER (PURCHASED 4 YEARS AGO AND USED FRO FAMILY VACATIONS)- (2,000) WHAT IS DAVID'S DAGI FOR THE CURRENT YEAR?

DURING 2011, TREVOR HAS THE FOLLOWING CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS: LTCG LT- COLLECTIBLE GAIN STCG STCL AFTER THE NETTING PROCESS, THE FOLLOWING RESULTS:

ON A PARTICULAR SATURDAY, TOM HAD PLANNED TO PAINT A ROOM IN HIS HOUSE, BUT HIS EMPLOYER HAVEHIM THE OPPORTUNITY TO WORK THAT DAY. IF TOM WORKS, HE MUST HIRE A PAINTER FOR $100. FOR TOM TO HAVE A POSITIVE CASH FLOW ROMM WORKING AND HIRING THE PAINTER:

THE TAX CONCEPT AND ECONOMIC CONCEPT OF INCOME ARE IN AGREEMENT ON WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING:

THE BLUE UTILITIES COMPANY PAID SUE $2,000 FOR THE RIGHT TO LAY AN UNDERGOUND ELECTRIC CABLE ACROSS HER PROPERTY ANYTIME IN THE FUTURE.

FOR THE PURPOSES OF DETERMINING GROSS INCOME, WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE?

DETROIT CORPORATION SUED CHICAGO CORPORATION FOR INTENTIONAL DAMAGE TO DETROIT'S GOODWILL. DETROIT HAD CREATED ITS GOODWILL THROUGH PROVIDING HIGH-QUALITY SERVICES TO ITS CUSTOMERS. THUS, NO BASIS FOR THE GOODWILL APPEARED ON DETROIT'S BALANCE SHEET. THE SUIT WAS SETTLED AND DETROIT RECEIVED $1,500,000 FOR THE DAMAGES TO ITS GOODWILL.

THE ANNUAL INCREASE IN THE CASH SURRENDER VALUE OF A LIFE INSURANCE POLICY:

TURNER, A SUCCESSFUL EXECUTIVE, IS NEGOTIATING A COMPENSATION PLAN WITH HIS POTENTIAL EMPLOYER. THE EMPLOYER HAS OFFERED TO PAY TURNER A $600,000 ANNUAL SALARY, PAYABLE AT THE RATE OF $50,000 PER MONTH. TURNER COUNTEROFFERS TO RECEIVE A MONTHLY SALARY OF $40,000 ($480,000 ANNUALLY) AND A $180,000 BONUS IN 5 YEARS WHEN TURNER WILL BE AGE 65.

MAROON CORPORATION IS CONSIDERING DEFERRRED COMPENSATION PLANS FOR ITS EXECUTIVE EMPLOYEES OVER AGE 55. ALL OF THE EMPLOYEES USE THE CASH METHOD OF ACCOUNTING. ONE PLAN IS TO ALLOW THE EMPLOYEE TO MAKE AN ELECTION AT THE BEGINNING OF THE YEAR TO DEFER 10% OF HIS OR HER SALARY UNTIL RETIREMENT,AT WHICH TIME THE EXECUTIVE WOULD RECEIVE THE DEFERRED PAY PLUS 6% INTEREST

THE ANNUAL INCREASE IN THE CASH SURRENDER VALUE OF A LIFE INSURANCE POLICY:

UNDER THE ORGINAL ISSUE DISCOUNT (OID) RULES AS APPLIED TO A THREE-YEAR CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT:

FREDDY PURCHASED A CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT FOR $20,000 ON JANUARY 1, 2011. THE CERTIFICATE'S MATURITY VALUE IN TWO YEARS (DECEMBER 31, 2012) IS $22,050, YIELDING 5% BEFORE- TAX INTEREST.

JERRY PURCHASED A U.S SERIES EE SAVINGS BOND FOR $279. THE BOND HAS A MATURITY VALUE IN 10 YEARS OF $500 AND YIELDS 6% INTEREST. THIS IS THE FIRST SERIES EE BOND THAT HERRY HAS EVER OWNED.

OFFICE PALACE, INC., LEASED AN ALL IN ONE PRINTER TO A NEW CUSTOMER, ASHLEY, ON DECEMBER 7, 2011. THE PRINTER WAS TO RENT FOR $600 PER MONTH FOR A PERIOD OF 36 MONTHS BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2012. ASHLEY WAS REQUIRED TO PAY THE FIRST AND LAST MONTH'S RENT AT THE TIME THE LEASE WAS SIGNED. ASHLEY WS ALSO REQUIRED TO PAY A $1,500 DAMAGE DEPOSIT. OFFICE PALACE MMUST RECOGNIZE AS INCOME FOR THE LEASE.

KATHY OPERATES A GYM. SHE SELLS MEMBERSHIPS THAT ENTITLE THE MEMBER TO USE THE FACILITIES AT ANY TIME. A ONE-YEAR MEMBERSHIP COSTS $360 ($360/12 = $30 PER MONTH); A TWO YEAR MEMBERSHIP COSTS $600 ($600/24 - $25 PER MONTH). CASH PAYMENT IS REQUIRED AT THE BEGINNING OF THE MEMBERSHIP PERIOD. ON JULY 1, 2011, KATHY SOLD A ONE YEAR MEMBERSHIP AND A TWO YEAR MEMBERSHIP. 1. IF KATHY IS A CASH BASIS TAXPAYER, HER 2011 GROSS INCOME FROM THE CONTRACTS IS $960 ($360+$600) 2. IF KATHY IS AN ACCRUAL BASIS TAXPAYER, HER 2011 GROSS INCOME FROM THE CONTRACTS IS $330 [(6/12 X $360) + (6/24 X $600)] 3. IF KATHY IS AN ACCRUAL BASIS TAXPAYER, HER 2012 GROSS INCOME FROM THE CONTRACTS IS $630 [(6/12)($360) + ($450)].

ORANGE CABLE TV COMPANY, AN ACCRUAL BASIS TAXPAYER, ALLOWS ITS CUSTOMERS TO PAY BY THE END OF THE YEAR IN ADVANCE ($500 PER YEAR), OR TWO YEARS IN ADVANCE ($950). IN SEPTEMBER 2011, THE COMPANY COLLECTED THE FOLLOWING AMOUNT APPLICABLE TO FUTURE SERVICES: OCTOBER 2011- SEPT 2013 SERVVICES (2 YR CONTRACTS)- $144,000 OCT 2011-SEPT 2012 SERVICES (1 YR CONTRACTS)- $128,000 TOTAL= $272,000 AS A RESULT OF THE ABOVE, ORANGE CABLE SHOULD REPORT AS GROSS INCOME:

WITH RESPECT TO THE PREPAID INCOME FROM SERVICES, WHICH OF HE FOLLOWING IS TRUE?

WITH RESPECT TO INCOME FROM SERVICES, WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE?

THE GREEN COMPANY, AN ACCRUAL BASIS TAXPAYER, PROVIDES BUSINESS-CONSULTING SERVICES. CLIENTS GENERALLY PAY A RETAINER AT THE BEGINNING OF A 12- MONTH PERIOD. THIS ENTITLES THE CLIENT TO NO MORE THAN 40 HOURS OF SERVICES. ONCE THE CLIENT HAS RECEIVED 40 HOURS OF SERVICES, GREEN CHARGES $500 PER HOUR. GREEN COMPANY ALLOCATES THE RETAINER TO INCOMME BASED ON THE NUMBER OF HOURS WORKED ON THE CONTRACT. AT THE END OF THE TAX YEAR, THE COMPANY HAD $50,000 OF UNEARNED REVENUES FROM THESE CONTRACTS. THE COMPANY ALSO HAD $10,000 IN UNEARNED RENT INCOME RECEIVED FROM EXCESS OFFICE SPACE LEASED TO OTHER COMPANIES. BASED ON THE ABOVE, GREEN MUST INCLUDE IN GROSS INCOME FOR THE CURRENT YEAR:

TEAL COMPANY IS AN ACCRUAL BASIS TAXPAYER. ON DECEMBER 1, 2011, A CUSTOMER PAID FOR AN ITEM THAT WAS ON HAND, BUT THE CUSTOMER WANTED THE ITEM DELIVERED IN EARLY JANUARY 2012. TEAL DELIVERED THE ITEM ON JANUARY 4, 2012. TEAL INCLUDED THE SALE IN ITS 201 INCOME FOR FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING PURPOSES.

ON JANUARY 5TH, 2011, JANE PURCHASED A BOND PAYING INTEREST AT 6% FOR $30,000. ON SEPTEMBER 30, 2011, SHE GAVE THE BOND TO TIM. THE BOND PAYS $1,800 INTEREST ON DECEMBER 31. JANE AND TIM ARE CASH BASIS TAXPAYERS. WHEN TIM COLLECTS THE INTEREST IN DECEMBER 2011:

MIKE CONTRACTED WITH KRAM COMPANY, MIKE'S CONTROLLED CORPORATION. MIKE WAS A MEDICAL DOCTOR AND THE CONTRACT PROVIDED THAT HE WOULD WORK EXCLUSIVELY FOR THE CORPORATION. NO OTHER DOCTOR WORKED FOR THE CORPORATION. THE CORPORATION CONTRACTED TO PERFORM AN OPERATION FOR ROSA FOR $4,000. THE CORPORATION PAID MIKE $6,500 TO PERFORM THE OPERATION UNDER THE TERMS OF HIS EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT.

AS A GENERAL RULE: 1. INCOME FROM PROPERTY IS TAXED TO THE PERSON WHO OWNS THE PROPERTY. 2. INCOME FROM SERVICES IS TAXED TO THE PERSON WHO EARNS THE INCOME. 3. THE ASSIGNEE OF INCOME FROM PROPERTY MUST PAY TAX ON THE INCOME. 4. THE PERSON WHO RECIEVES THE BENEFIT OF THE INCOME MUST PAY THE TAX ON THE INCOME.

ON OCT 1, 2011, BOB, A CASH BASIS TAXPAYER, GAVE DAVE COMMON STOCK THAT PAID A DIVIDEND OF $1,000 ON DECEMBER 15, 2011. ON NOVEMBER 15, 2011, THE CORPORATION DECLARED THE DIVIDEND PAYABLE TO SHAREHOLDERS OF RECORD AS NOVEMBER 22, 2011. THE CORPORATION HAS PAID THE $1,000 DIVIDEND ONCE EACH YEAR FOR THE PAST TEN YEARS, DURING WHICH BOB OWNED THE STOCK. WHEN DAVE COLLECTED THE DIVIDEND ON DECEMBER 15, 2011:

DANIEL PURCHASED A BOND ON JULY 1, 2011, AT PAR OF $10,000 PLUS ACCRUED INTEREST OF $300. ON DECEMBER 31, 2011, DANIEL COLLECTED THE $600 INTEREST FOR THE YEAR. ON JANUARY 1, 2012 DANIEL SOLD THE BOND FOR $10,200.

THERESA A CASH BASIS TAXPAYER, PURCHASED A BOND ON JULY 1, 2008, FOR $10,000, PLUS $400 OF ACCRUED INTEREST. THE BOND PAID $800 OF INTEREST EACH DECEMBER 31. ON MARCH 31, 2011, SHE SOLD THE BOND FOR $10,150, WHICH INCLUDED $200 OF ACCRUED INTEREST.

DARRYL, A CASH BASIS TAXPAYER, GAVE 1,000 SHARES OF COPPER COMPANY COMMON STOCK TO HIS DAUGHTER ON SEPTEMBER 29, 2011. COPPER COMPANY IS A PUBLICLY HELD COMPANY THAT HAS DECLARED A $2.00 PER SHARE DIVIDEND ON SEPTEMBER 30TH EVERY YEAR FOR THE LAST 20 YEARS. JUST AS DARRYL HAD EXPECTED, COPPER COMPANY DECLARED A $2.00 PER SHARE DIVIDEND ON SEPTEMBER 30TH, PAYABLE ON OCT 15TH, TO STOCKHOLDERS OF RECORD AS OF OCT 10TH. THE DAUGHTER RECIEVED TEH $2,000 DIVIDEND ON OCT 18TH, 2011

WAYNE OWNS A 25% INTEREST IN THE CAPITAL AND PROFITS OF EMERALD COMPANY (A CALENDAR YEAR PARTNERSHIP). FOR TAX YEAR 2011, THE PARTNERSHIP EARNED REVENUE OF $600,000 AND HAD OPERATING EXPENSES OF $300,000. DURING THE YEAR, WAYNE WITHDREW FROM THE PARTNERSHIP A TOTAL OF $64,000. HE ALSO INVESTED AN ADDITIONAL $20,000 IN THE PARTNERSHIP. FOR 2011, WAYNE'S GROSS INCOME FROM THE PARTNERSHIP IS:

HARRY AND WANDA WERE MARRIED IN TEXAS, A COMMUNITY PROPERTY STATE, BUT MOVED TO VIRGINIA, A COMMON LAW STATE. THE CALCULATION OF THEIR INCOME ON A JOINT RETURN:

JIM AND NORA, RESIDENTS OF A COMMUNITY PROPERTY STATE, WERE MARRIED IN EARLY 2009. LATE IN THE 2009 THEY SEPARATED, AND IN 2011 THEY WERE DIVORCED. EACH EARNED A SALARY, AND THEY RECEIVED INCOME FROM COMMUNITY OWNED INVESTMENTS IN ALL RELEVANT YEARS. THEY FILED SEPARATE RETUNS IN 2009 AND 2010.

THE UNDERLYING RATIONALE FOR THE ALIMONY RULE IS THAT:

TRAVIS AND ANDREA WERE DIVORCED. THEIR ONLY MARITAL PROPERTY COSISTED OF A PERSONAL RESIDENCE (FAIR MARKET VALUE OF $400,000, COST OF $200,000), AND PUBLICLY-TRADED STOCKS (FAIR MARKET VALUE OF $800,000, COST BASIS OF $500,000). UNDER THE TERMS OF THE DIVORCE AGREEMENT, ANDREA RECIEVED THE PERSONAL RESIDENCE AND TRAVIS RECEIVED THE STOCKS. IN ADDITION, ANDREA WAS TO RECIEVE $50,000 FOR EIGHT YEARS. 1. IF THE $50,000 ANNUAL PAYMENTS ARE TO BE MADE TO ANDREA OR HER ESTATE (IF SHE DIES BEFORE THE END OF THE EIGHT YEARS), THE PAYMENTS WILL QUALIFY AS ALIMONY. 2. ANDREA HAS A TAXABLE GAIN FROM AND EXCHANGE OF HER ONE-HALF INTEREST IN THE STOCKS FOR TRAVIS' ONE HALF INTEREST IN THE HOUSE AND CASH. 3. IF TRAVIS SELLS THE STOCKS FOR $900,000, HE MUST RECOGNIZE A $400,000 GAIN.

WHICH OF THE OLLWING IS NOT A REQUIREMENT FOR AN ALIMONY DEDUCTION?

TIM AND JANET WERE DIVORCED. THEIR ONLY MARITAL PROPERTY WAS A PERSONAL RESIDENCE WITH A VALUE OF $120,000 AND COST OF $50,000. UNDER THE TERMS OF THE DIVORCE AGREEMENT, JANET WOULD RECEIVE THE HOUSE AND JANET WOULD PAY TIM $15,000 EACH YEAR FOR 5 YEARS, OR UNTIL TIM'S DEATH, WHICHEVER SHOULD OCCUR FIRST. TIME AND JANET LIVED APARTWHEN THE PAYMENTS WERE MADE TO TIM. THE DIVORCE AGREEMENT DID NOT CONTAIN THE WORD "ALIMONY"

THELMA AND MITCH WERE DIVORCED. THE COUPLE HAD A JOINT BROKERAGE ACCOUNT THAT INCLUDED STOCKS WITH A BASIS OF $600,000 AND A FAIR MARKET $1,000,000. UNDER THE TERMS OF THE DIVORCE AGREEMENT, MITCH WOULD RECEIVE THE STOCKS AND MITCH WOULD PAY THELMA $100,000 EACH YEAR FOR 6 YEARS, OR UNTIL THELMA'S DEATH, WHICHEVER SHOULD OCCUR FIRST. THELMA AND MITCH LIVED APART WHEN THE PAYMENTS WERE MADE BY MITCH. MITCH PAID THE $600,000 TO THELMA OVER THE SIX YEAR PERIOD. THE DIVORCE AGREEMENT DID NOT CONTAIN THE WORD "ALIMONY". THEN, MITCH SOLD THE STOCKS FOR $1,300,000. MITCH'S RECOGNIZED GAIN FROM THE SALE IS:

THE ALIMONY RECAPTURE RULES ARE INTENDED TO:

THE ALIMONY RULES

UNDER THE TERMS OF A DIVORCE AGREEMENT, KIM WAS TO PAY HER HUSBAND TOM $3,000 PER MONTH IN ALIMONY AND $2,000 PER MONTH IN CHILD SUPPORT. FOR A 12 MONTH PERIOD, KIM CAN DEDUCT FROM GROSS INCOME (AN TOM MUST INCLUDE IN GROSS INCOME):

UNDER THE TERMS OF A DIVORCE AGREEMENT, LANNY WAS TO PAY HIS WIFE JOYCE $2,000 PER MONTH IN ALIMONY AND $500 PER MONTH IN CHILD SUPPORT. FOR A TWELVE-MONTH PERIOD, LANNY CAN DEDUCT FROM GROSS INCOME (AND JOYCE MUST INCLUDE IN GROSS INCOME):

UNDER THE THERMS OF A DIVORCE AGREEMENT, RON IS TO PAY HIS FORMER WIFE JILL $12,000 PER MONTH. THE PAYMENTS ARE TO BE REDUCED TO $4,000 PER MONTH WHEN THEIR 15 YR OLD CHILD REACHES AGE 18. DURING THE CURRENT YEAR, RON PAID $144,000 UNDER THE AGREEMENT. ASSUMING ALL OF THE OTHER CONDITIONS FOR ALIMONY ARE SATISFIED, RON CAN DEDUCT FROM GROSS INCOME (AND JILL MUST INCLUDE IN GROSS INCOME) AS ALIMONY:

IN THE CASE OF A BELOW MARKET LOAN BETWEEN FAMILY MEMBERS, IF THE IMPUTED INTEREST RULES APPLY: 1. THE BORROWER MUST RECOGNIZE INTEREST INCOME. 2. THE LENDER HAS INTEREST INCOME 3. THE LENDER IS DEEMED TO HAVE MADE A GIFT 4. THE BORROWER HAS INTEREST EXPENSE

ON JANUARY 1, FATHER (DAVE) LOANED DAUGHTER (DEBRA) $100,000 TO PURCHASE A NEW CAR AND TO PAY OFF COLLEGE LOANS. THERE WERE NO OTHER LOANS OUTSTANDING BETWEEN DAVE AND DEBRA. THE RELEVANT FEDERAL RATE ON INTEREST WAS 6%. THE LOAN WAS OUTSTANDING FOR THE ENTIRE YEAR.

THE EFFECTS OF BELOW MARKET VALUE LOAN FOR $450,000 MADE BY A CORPORATION TO ITS CHEIF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AS AN ENTICEMENT TO GET HIM TO REMAIN WITH THE COMPANY ARE:

SARAH, A MAJORITY SHAREHOLDER IN TEAL, INC., MADE A $200,000 INTEREST- FREE LOAN TO THE CORPORATION. SARAH IS NOT AN EMPLOYEE OF THE CORPORATION.

SHARON MADE A $60,000 INTEREST FREE LOAN TO HER SON, TODD, WHO USED THE MONEY TO START A NEW BUSINESS. TODD'S ONLY SOURCES OF INCOME WERE $25,000 FROM THE BUSINESS AND $490 OF INTEREST ON HIS CHECKING ACCOUNT. THE RELEVANT FEDERAL INTEREST RATE WAS 5%. BASED ON THE ABOVE INFORMATION:

JAY, A SINGLE TAX PAYER, RETIRED FROM HIS JOB AS APUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHER IN 2011. HE IS TO RECIEVE A RETIREMENT ANNUITY OF $1,000 EACH MONTH AND HIS LIFE EXPECTANCY IS 150 MONTHS. HE CONTRIBUTED $30,000 TO THE PENSION PLAN DURING HIS 35 YEAR CAREER, SO HIS ADJUSTED BASIS IS $30,000. WHAT IS THE CORRECT METHOD FOR REPORTING THE PENSION INCOME?

IN 2011, TODD PURCHASED AN ANNUITY FOR $200,000. THE ANNUITY IS TO PAY HIM $2,500 PER MONTH FOR THE REST OF HIS LIFE. HIS LIFE EXPECTANCY IS 100 MONTHS. WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING IS CORRECT?

SETH, A CALENDAR YEAR TAXPAYER, PURCHASED AN ANNUITY FOR $50,000 IN 2009. THE ANNUITY WAS TO PAY HIM $3,000 ON THE FIRST DAY OF EACH YEAR, BEGINNING IN 2009, FOR THE REMAINDER OF HIS LIFE. SETH'S LIFE EXPECTANCY AT THE TIME HE PURCHASED THE ANNUITY WAS 20 YEARS. IN 2011, SETH DEVELOPED A DEADLY DISEASE, AND DOCTORS ESTIMATED THAT HE WOULD LIVE FOR NO MORE THAN 24 MONTHS.

BETTY PURCHASED AN ANNUITY FOR $24,000 IN 2011. UNDER THE CONTRACT, BETTY WILL RECIEVE $300 EACH MONTH FOR THE REST OF HER LIFE. ACCORDING TO THE ACTURIAL ESTIMATES, BETTY WILL LIVE TO RECEIBE 96 PAYMENTS AND WILL RECEIVE A 3% RETURN ON HER ORGINAL INVESTMENT

GORDON, AN EMPLOYEE, IS PROVIDED GROUP TERM LIFE INSURANCE COVERAGE EQUAL TO TWICE HIS ANNUAL SALARY OF $125,000 PER YEAR. ACCORDING TO THE IRS UNIFORM PREMIUM TABLE (BASED ON GORDON'S AGE), THE AMOUNT IS $12 PER YEAR FOR $1,000 OF PROTECTION. THE COST OF AN INDIVIDUAL POLICY WOULD BE $15 PER YEAR FOR $1,000 OF PROTECTION. SINCE GORDON PAID NOTHING TOWARDS THE COST OF THE $250,000 PROTECTION, GORDON MUST INCLUDE IN HIS 2011 GROSS INCOME WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING AMOUNTS?

GREEN, INC., PROVIDES GROUP TERM LIFE INSURANCE FOR ALL OF ITS EMPLOYEES. THE COVERAGE EQUALS TWICE THE EMPLOYEE'S ANNUAL SALARY. SAM, A VICE-PRESIDENT, WORKED ALL YEAR FOR GREEN, INC. AND RECIEVED $250,000 OF COVERAGE FOR THE YEAR AT A COST TO GREEN OF $3,000. THE UNIFORM PREMIUMS (BASED ON SAM'S AGE) ARE $.30 PER MONTH FOR $1,000 OF PROTECTION. HOW MUCH MUST SAM INCLUDE IN GROSS INCOME THIS YEAR?

TURNER, INC., PROVIDES GROUP TERM LIFE INSURANCE TO THE OFFICERS OF THE CORPORATION ONLY. JANET, A VICE- PRESIDENT, RECIEVED $400,000 OF COVERAGE FOR THE YEAR AT A COST TO TURNER, INC. OF $5,600. THE UNIFORM PREMIMUMS (BASED ON JANET'S AGE) ARE $15 A YEAR FOR $1,000 PROTECTION. HOW MUCH OF THIS MUST JANET INCLUDE IN GROSS INCOME THIS YEAR?

THE AMOUNT OF SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS RECEIVED BY AN INDIVIDUAL THAT HE OR SHE MUST INCLUDE IN GROSS INCOME:

THE TAXABLE PORTION OF SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS IS DEPENDENT UPON:

DEBBIE IS AGE 67 AND UNMARRIED AND HER ONLY SOURCES OF INCOME ARE $240,000 IN TAXABLE INTEREST AND $20,000 OF SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS. DEBBIE'S ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME FOR THE YEAR IS:

MARGARET OWNS LAND THA APPRECIATES AT THE RATE OF 10% EACH YEAR. RALPH OWN A ZERO COUPON (I.E., AL LOF THE INTEREST IS PAID AT MATURITY BUT IS TAXED ANNUALLY) CORPORATE BOND WITH A YIELD TO MATURITY OF 10%. AT THE END OF 10 YEARS, THE BOND WILL MATURE AND THE LAND WILL BE SOLD. AT THE END OF THE 10 YEARS.