Since the globalisation emerged in the 1950s, it has exerted profound effects on the development of concerns around the universe. The rapid growing of internationalisation and the debut of advanced engineerings have facilitated the enlargement of industrialised organisations, ensuing in an addition in the figure and significance of transnational companies ( MNCs ) . Research on MNCs, particularly on how they have managed their people in different states to better economic public presentation and the deductions of this on managerial behavior, as a effect, have been of involvement to many faculty members and practicians. This has led to the outgrowth of international human resource direction ( IHRM ) as 'a subdivision of direction surveies that investigates the design and effects of organizational human resource patterns in cross-cultural context ' ( Peltonen, 2006 cited in De Cieri et al. , 2007, p. 283 ) .

Although the acknowledgment of the importance of human resource direction ( HRM ) to the success or failure in international concern has been turning rapidly overtime, there is still a deficiency of consensus about whether there is one best manner to pull off human resources in international context or non. Several research workers recommending convergence attack claimed that HRM would be converged and universalized under the impacts of environmental alterations such as globalization and technological betterment while others following the divergency attack stated that there were many variables moving as restraints on implementing 'best pattern ' . This paper foremost will critically discourse these two positions. Then, it will analyze a instance survey of the transportation of HRM patterns from a UK retail house - StoreCo to its Chinese subordinates to reply this inquiry.

Convergence attack to IHRM

Convergence theory, alleged 'universalist paradigm ' ( Girgin, 2005 ) , has its roots in the point of views of direction patterns in the center of the 20th century, and has gained widespread credence in the United States ( US ) .

One of the earliest parts to the thesis of convergence was the theory of bureaucratism and rationalisation of Max Weber. However, the convergence position was really propagated until the book entitled Industrialism and the Industrial Work force: The jobs of labor and direction in economic growing written by Kerr et Al. was published. Harmonizing to Kerr et al. , the technological and economic forces, as 'a logic of industrialism ' , would ensue in greater similarities in constructions and work organisation, hence, produce progressive convergence towards the most efficient form of direction pattern, viz.

the US theoretical account ( Girgin, 2005 ; Gooderham et al. , 2004 ) . It was because the widespread acceptance of advanced engineerings into operations needed houses to seek a more effectual manner of direction and labour organisation. Meanwhile, the US was the industrial and technological leader, presently being considered the best in direction patterns. Consequently, it could be inferred that other states would try to copy the US and therefore 'patterns in other states were viewed as derived function of, or derivations from the US theoretical account ' ( Locke et al.

, 1995 cited in Gooderham et al. , 2004, p.19 ) .Since the convergence point of position was introduced, it has gained much support from both globalisation and dealing economic theories. Based on convergence thesis, the advocates of the globalisation position besides claimed that under the forces of globalisation, a 'borderless universe ' was created, which in bend made international houses become 'transnationals ' and separated from their original nationalities ( Girgin, 2005 ) .

When nationality elements are overshadowed, MNCs would so be given to use a new 'best theoretical account ' and as stated even stronger by dealing economic theoreticians, there would be one best manner to pull off people at any period of clip ( Williamson, 1975, 1985 cited in Gooderham et al. , 2004 ) .Although convergence thesis appeared to be sensible particularly in the international economic integrating procedure, the fact that it laid excessively much emphasis on the impact of engineering and market, and merely sought similarities in concern in general and IHRM in peculiar made it strongly criticized. As Rowley and Benson ( 2000 ) asserted, such positions were excessively simplistic to presume that all organisations can bring forth competitory advantage to vie with each other by runing in the same manner. Furthermore, the fact that Nipponese MNCs with different organizational construction and direction method have operated successfully in the universe market and challenged the industrial leader place of those in the US, have led to the development of another point of view - divergency attack.

Divergence attack to IHRM

Contrary to convergence point of position which assumed that the differences of local patterns in HRM were merely the contemplation of different phases of development and will be finally replaced by 'one best manner ' , advocators of divergency mentality agreed that there were important spreads in the context playing as restraints on convergence tendency.

They were chiefly argued and examined by two strands of divergency attack - culturalist and institutional positions.

The culturalist position

The culturalist attack is largely based on Hofstede 's constructs of national civilization and its dimensions, and focuses on the influences of civilization when explicating the differentiation of MNCs ' managerial behaviours. In the book Culture 's effect: International differences in work-related values, Hofstede ( 1984, p.21 ) defined civilization as 'the synergistic sum of common features that influence a human group 's response to its environment ' . Therefore, in order to pull off forces efficaciously in international graduated table, MNCs must be cognizant of the effects of assorted cultural-based norms and societal values, bing acquisition manners and response manners and effort to accommodate direction patterns from one civilization to another ( Ferris et al.

, 1999 ) . This has been well supported by a assortment of comparative surveies conducted by several experts such as Tayeb ( 1994, 1998 ) , Nam ( 1995 ) , Gill and Wong ( 1998 ) . For case, in a instance survey research of Nipponese transnational subordinate in Britain, Tayeb ( 1994 ) found that the differences in perceptual experience of leading manner of British and Nipponese employees were consistent with their cultural backgrounds. Consequently, in order to successfully reassign Nipponese patterns in the United Kingdom ( UK ) subordinates, Nipponese directors had to be really selective in the acceptance of the original direction systems and had to modify some of them to accommodate to local conditions. As Kamoche ( 1996 ) insisted, it was the cultural differences between states that produce a grade of 'differentiation ' in the direction of human resources in international context.

Although there is no uncertainty that the fluctuations in national civilizations are presently more or less act uponing the fluctuations in managerial behavior, there are several convincing grounds why this theory needs to be assessed. First, the literature of Hofstede, the basis of the culturalist attack, was criticized to hold methodological defects and weak conceptualisation of civilization, which merely attributed national degree actions/ establishments to national civilization without any theoretical foundation ( McSweeny, 2002 ) . Second, this attack, because of concentrating excessively much on history and single perceptual experiences, simply viewed national values and norms as deep-rooted factors and overlooked any alterations in values that may originate over clip ( Girgin, 2005 ) . Consequently, it might be hard to explicate a tendency towards individuality among younger coevals in some Asiatic states such as Japan and Korea, which normally emphasise on Bolshevism, and its effects on HRM of MNCs ( Sano, 1998 cited in Rowley and Benson, 2000 ) .

Last but non least, the theory of Hofstede was unable to supply complete account for the deductions of its behavioral indices, including power distance index, maleness and long-run orientation, for the alteration of work administration and managerial behavior in assorted states ( Girgin, 2005 ) .

The institutionalist position

Compared to culturalist strand, the institutionalist point of position is considered to be a more comprehensive attack as it gives a clearer definition of societal institutional environment and system as a footing to elaborate the organizational behavior. The national ( or regional ) 'business system ' - or 'social systems of production ' , called by Hollingsworth and Boyer, was defined as a set of 'interlocking constructions and establishments that basically shape the nature of markets, competition and concern activity in general ' ( Ferner, 2000 ) . Besides that, this position besides represents itself as the strongest challenge to convergence theory when it contended that personnel direction systems were embedded in their ain national institutional environments, including 'the province, regulative constructions, involvement groups, public sentiment and norms ' , instead than driven by the economic and technological forces ( Gooderham, 2004 ) .

Harmonizing to Ferner ( 2000 ) , despite the fact that there has been an increasing tendency in adoption and disseminating patterns in MNCs due to the intensified competition in the universe market, it would non needfully take to convergence. It was because adoptions would be more or less modified to accommodate to the bing complex national concern systems ( Ferner, 2000 ) . Since there are different national development waies, there will be different signifiers of concern administration and HRM patterns severally.Some oppositions might knock that institutional attack focused excessively much on the socially constructed organizational signifiers while understating the significance of organizational bureau, particularly, in the early work, simply considered institutional contexts as stable elements without taking into history institutional alterations ( Bjorkman, 2006 ; Edwards and Kuruvilla, 2005 ) . However, articles on this theory published in several celebrated diaries late have shown that faculty members and practicians have begun to put more emphasis on the procedures of deinstitutionalisation every bit good as wage more attending to the influences of involvement, bureau, organizational phenomena, societal Fieldss, industries both at the national and international degrees ( Bjorkman, 2006 ) . Furthermore, institutional theoreticians besides stated that they did non see the development of national concern system as the determiner of future organizational picks stiffly.

Their rule aim, as stated by Ferner ( 2000 ) , is to supply a conceptual model to the comparative survey of distinguishable 'social systems of production ' . Then, understanding of how the behavior of MNCs in host states are different from those in their states of beginning will be revealed and analysed.

There is no 1 best manner but…

Based on what stated supra, it could be confirmed that there is no 1 best manner in pull offing human resource in international context. Although no 1 could deny the increasing convergence tendency among national economic systems because of the force per unit areas of globalisation and the widespread acceptance of advanced engineerings, national concern system and civilization remain extremely important factors which could greatly impede the execution of convergence. In order to clear up this issue, a instance survey of the transportation of HRM patterns from a UK MNC named StoreCo to its subordinate - DecoStore - in China will be carefully analysed.

StoreCo was a British-owned retail merchant established in the late sixtiess. In June 1999 it built the first purpose-made cosmetic stuffs warehouse shop in Shanghai named DecoStore. Then, it expanded its operation by opening the 2nd shop besides in Shanghai in May 2000 ( Gamble, 2003 ) . During the procedure of constructing up its subordinates in China, a basic attack this corporation used was copying its UK patterns in all facets from supply concatenation direction to selling, shop layout and HRM. The overall concern scheme of DecoStore was decided by the parent company in the UK and exile directors were sent to DecoStore to ease the diffusion of standardised MNC patterns.

Exiles were non merely in charge of distributing out standard operating procedures but besides of originating HR processs such as choice, enlisting, preparation and publicity. Additionally, StoreCo organized preparation classs to better and standardise preparation for both shopfloor and managerial staff of its subordinates. Table 1 below starkly illustrates how HRM patterns were transferred to DecoStore.( Trich mention )Based on the above tabular array, DecoStore 's HRM patterns appeared to be instead similar to the theoretical account of its UK parent corporate.

Namely, both of them had the same non-hierachy organizational construction and an in-house employee representative audience system called 'Grass Roots ' . However, there remained some remarked differences between StoreCo and its subordinates. First, in footings of communicating with work force, while StoreCo tended to be unfastened about providing employees with elaborate information from corporate scheme to day-to-day gross revenues figures, DecoStore seemed to be less communicative to its staff which was reasonably similar to Chinese state-owned endeavors. This, harmonizing to Gamble ( 2003 ) , could be caused by the influence of host state subjects, particularly DecoStore senior Chinese manager who required maintaining company secret for security in an intensely competitory market place. Second, in footings of work form, due to the impact of local concern system, viz. the low-priced labor market, DecoStore were able to use all full-time employees and that were wholly contrasted with its UK parent house where a big proportion of labour force worked parttime.

In add-on, since there were no tradition of make it yourself ( DIY ) service in Shanghai and great concern of expartriate directors about hapless on the job wonts among older workers, DecoStore preferred to engage younger coevals and provided more extended and systematic training-courses than those of its UK parent-country endeavor. The impacts of national concern system were besides clearly reflected by the being of trade brotherhood and reimbursement policy of medical attention costs and meal subsidy in the wages system of Chinese subordinate which were non offered in StoreCo payment degrees. Consequently, it could be concluded that even though StoreCo tried to use consistent people direction methods it considered the best to its subordinates, there remained a divergency in HRM patterns between StoreCo and DecoStore due to the effects of host state subjects, national institutional contexts and cultural factors. This means that although national economic systems are so become progressively converged under the deductions of advanced engineerings and globalization, national differences continue to be major step ining and chairing elements impacting how organisations operate, and hence, there would be no one best manner in pull offing human resources in international context.

Decision

In decision, since IHRM was emerged, there has been a broad argument between convergence and divergency positions about whether there is one best manner in pull offing people in international context.

Convergence theoreticians believed that under the technological and economic forces, constructions and work organisation would go similar and converge towards the most efficient form of direction pattern, viz. the US theoretical account. In contrast, divergency attack offered several empirical surveies to turn out that cultural or national institutional concern system would move as restraints on the execution of 'one best pattern ' across assorted states. It might be true that national economic systems are so going progressively converged in the international economic integrating procedure.

Nonetheless, based on the analysed instance survey, this paper has suggested that even though MNCs will seek to use a commanding method they considered the best to their subordinates in order to procure benefits from the consistence in human resource ( HR ) patterns in single MNCs across states every bit good as contribute to the execution of a planetary concern scheme, there would be no one best manner in personnel direction. IHRM, alternatively, might be the combination of both theoretical account of parent company and peculiar characteristics influenced by local institutional environment and cultural elements.