The recent release of the Intel Pentium III has consumers as well as businesses concerned about the privacy of the computer world. The controversial issue is a feature in the Pentium III chip known as a Processor Serial Number or PSN.
It identifies individual machines connected to the internet by way of a unique number embedded in the chip. According to Intel the PSN will be used to identify users in electronic commerce and other net-based applications. The PSN will be used as access control for questionable material on the internet. Intel also admits thought that when used in conjunction with user name and password the PSN can be used by web sites to “identify useres when conduting e-commerce, or setting up member only chatrooms. The chip PSN can also be used in association with other individual identifying data to trace email, build databases of user habits, and monitor usage of copyrighted material. The PSN will help curb computer theft says Intel but others disagree.
They contend that the PSN feature would allow software makers to pierce the privacy of our computer users. The arguement is not with what the chip was made for but, against what could be done with it. The software makers would quickly use the PSN to monitor thier costomers behavior and create databases. With this capability companies can join databases and have access to personal information without the individual knowing.
So then there needs to be a governing body of people to regulate those companies as to what they can do with the information the PSN provides. But there is none. Intel said they would rely on the companies to police themselves, upholding a voluntary code that restricts the amount of information computer companies, Internet service providers, web sites and telecommunications companies can collect, and how they use it . This is where people get concerned.
What companies do with personal information is very frieghtening to some internet civil rights activist groups. That is why some of these groups have filed a formal complaint to do away with or disable the PSN with the Fedral Trade Commision. Intel spokepersons say that “they don’t want to” when asked to disable the PSN. Intel insists that the PSN has value and should be allowed to stay in the Pentium III chip.
The real issue of this debate is the privacy of people. I think that the civil rights groups are right in complaining about the PSN. Although it is was intentioned for good purpose the fact is that we can not be possitive that the PSN will be used the correct way all the time. We want this world to be a safe place and rejecting this feature from Intel is one way that we can assure oursleves that we are doing something to make it stay that way. Bibliography Unknown, What are the privacy Problems with The Proposal.
1999. Http://www.bigbrotherinside.com. Unknwon, Intel Boycott page. 1999.
http://www.permanenttourist.com/bbalert/intel-boycott.html Unknown, Prototype Code Didn’t get Erased From Some Chips. 1999. http://www.sfgate.com/ Word Count: 501
