Solution Guide: Please reword: Case 6-32 1. The contribution format income statements (in thousands of dollars) for the three alternatives are: | 18% Commission| 20% Commission| Own Sales Force| Sales| $30,000| | 100| %| $30,000| | 100| %| $30,000| | 100| %| Variable expenses:| | | | | | | | | | | | | Variable cost of goods sold| 17,400| | | | 17,400| | | | 17,400| | | | Commissions|    5,400| | | |    6,000| | | |    3,000| | | | Total variable expense|  22,800| |  76| %|  23,400| |  78| %|  20,400| |  68| %| Contribution margin|    7,200| |  24| %|    6,600| |  22| %|    9,600| |  32| %| Fixed expenses:| | | | | | | | | | | | |Fixed cost of goods sold| 2,800| | | | 2,800| | | | 2,800| | | | Fixed advertising expense| 800| | | | 800| | | | 1,300| *| | | Fixed marketing staff expense| | | | | | | | | 1,300| **| | | Fixed administrative expense|   3,200| | | |    3,200| | | |    3,200| | | | Total fixed expenses|   6,800| | | |    6,800| | | |    8,600| | | | Net operating income| $   400| | | | ($    200)| | | | $? 1,000| | | | *| $800,000 + $500,000 = $1,300,000| **| $700,000 + $400,000 + $200,000 = $1,300,000| 2.Given the data above, the break-even points can be determined using total fixed expenses and the CM ratios as follows: | a.

| | | b. | | | c. | | 3. | | 4. | | The two net operating incomes are equal when: 0. 32X – $8,600,000| =| 0.

22X – $6,800,000| 0. 10X| =| $1,800,000| X| =| $1,800,000 ? 0. 10| X| =| $18,000,000| Thus, at a sales level of $18,000,000 either plan will yield the same net operating income. This is verified below (in thousands of dollars): | 20% Commission| | Own Sales Force| Sales| $ 18,000| 100| %| | $ 18,000| 100| %|Total variable expense|    14,040|  78| %| |    12,240|  68| %| Contribution margin| 3,960|  22| %| | 5,760|  32| %| Total fixed expenses|      6,800| | | |      8,600| | | Net operating income| $ (2,840)| | | | $ (2,840)| | | 5. A graph showing both alternatives appears below: 6.

To:President of Marston Corporation Fm:Student’s name Assuming that a competent sales force can be quickly hired and trained and the new sales force is as effective as the sales agents, this is the better alternative. Also article Purely Monopolistic Seller,Using the data provided by the controller, net operating income is higher when the company has its own sales force unless sales fall below $18,000,000. At that level of sales and below the company would be losing money so it is unlikely that this would be the normal situation. The major concern I have with this recommendation is the assumption that the new sales force will be as effective as the sales agents.

The sales agents have been selling our product for a number of years, so they are likely to have more field experience than any sales force we hire.And, our own sales force would be selling just our product instead of a variety of products. On the one hand, that will result in a more focused selling effort. On the other hand, that may make it more difficult for a salesperson to get the attention of a hospital’s purchasing agent.

The purchasing agents may prefer to deal through a small number of salespersons each of whom sells many products rather than a large number of salespersons each of whom sells only a single product. Even so, we can afford some decrease in sales because of the lower cost of maintaining our own sales force.For example, assuming that the sales agents make the budgeted sales of $30,000,000, we would have a net operating loss of $200,000 for the year. We would do better than this with our own sales force as long as sales are greater than $26,250,000. In other words, we could afford a fall-off in sales of $3,750,000 or 12. 5% and still be better off with our own sales force.

If we are confident that our own sales force could do at least this well relative to the sales agents, then we should certainly switch to using our own sales force.