Since the beginning of clip until now. there has been an copiousness of leaders with many different traits. features. backgrounds. and manners. Leaderships have the alone ability to acquire others to make things volitionally. Throughout history. there have been many different types of leaders that emerge from different state of affairss. You have political leaders. military leaders. environmental leaders. organisational leaders. and the list goes on. Leaderships tend to hold many supporters and people that emulate them. Using leading theories. I will analyse my selected leader to place features and supply specific illustrations of leading qualities I think contributed to his success. I will besides explicate my leading manner and my thoughts and programs for bettering my effectivity as a leader. Command Sergeant Major ( CSM ) Chris Hardy to me is what a leader should be or endeavor to be. He was my Battalion CSM for a twosome of old ages.
He was the youngest individual of all time to do CSM in the history of the United States Army. He completed all military schools that are required for leading development and military schools for advanced tactics. arms. and survival preparation. He was person I looked up to and strived to be ; I am certain I was non the lone solider that felt this manner. The traits he possessed that made him a successful leader and a great leader are Loyalty. Selflessness. Bearing. Assurance. Decisiveness. Tact. Initiative. Assertiveness. Humility. Sense of Humor. Compassion. Respect. Honor. Integrity. and Charisma. The values that came with these traits are Courage. Candor. Competence. Discipline. Duty. Family and Commitment. CSM Hardy set the illustration of a true leader. He was tactically and technically adept. He was ever seeking self-reformation. He looked out for the public assistance of all soldiers under his bid and of those that were non under his bid. He made certain that all of his soldiers were informed of what to make and what was traveling on at all times.
He ensured that when undertakings were handed out. it was understood. supervised. and accomplished to the criterions that were set. He made certain that all squads. squads. platoons. and company’s had chumminess and a sense of pride for each other. All of his determinations were sound and seasonably. He besides empowered his leading and required that they empowered their soldiers. This was particularly critical and important ; because if anything happened to leading. the following cat in line needed to cognize and be able to transport out those responsibilities and execute them merely every bit good if non better. CSM Hardy’s leading actions and abilities helped pave the manner for us in the initial push of the invasion of Iraq. Due to his leading skills we as a Battalion did non lose many lives in combat during 2003-2004 while under his supervising. Give his place and characteristics/traits. I would state CSM Hardy fell under a few leading theories.
These theories are Situational leading theory. Path-Goal theory. Charismatic leading. Transformational leading. and Servant leading. Situational leading – Harmonizing to Robbins and Judge ( 2013 ) . situational leading focuses on the followings. Successful leading depends on choosing the right leading manner contingent on the followers’ preparedness. which is the extent to which they are willing and able to carry through a specific undertaking ( p. 376 ) . CSM Hardy needed to modify his leading manner depending on the preparedness of his leaders and their followings ( soldiers ) . that manner he can set the right people in the right topographic points and give out waies as needed. Path Goal – Harmonizing to Robbins and Judge ( 2013 ) . it is the leader’s occupation to supply followings with the information. support. or other resources necessary to accomplish their ends ( p. 376 ) . CSM Hardy had to supply information. support. and resources to leaders and followings ( soldiers ) in order to cut down barriers and accomplish ends. so the mission could be completed efficaciously and expeditiously.
Charismatic leading – Harmonizing to Robbins and Judge ( 2013 ) . magnetic leaders have a vision. are willing to take personal hazards to accomplish that vision. they are sensitive to follower demands. and they exhibit extraordinary behaviours. Charismatic leaders are likely to be extraverted. self-confident. and achievement oriented ( p. 380 ) . CSM Hardy made certain everyone bought into his vision and made certain everyone was on the same page. He besides made certain everyone was achievement oriented. because in order to be successful you need to accomplish and accomplish ends. Transformational leading – Harmonizing to Robbins and Judge ( 2013 ) . transformational leaders inspire followings to exceed their opportunisms for the good of the organisation ( p. 382 ) . CSM Hardy inspired non merely me. but many of others to use for military schools. Not merely for opportunisms and personal addition but so the battalion can be a more effectual combat machine. Servant leading – Harmonizing to Robbins and Judge ( 2013 ) . servant leaders go beyond their self-interest and concentrate on chances to assist followings turn and develop ( p. 387 ) .
To piggy-back off of transformational leading ; by doing certain our battalion had plentifulness of slots for military schools. CSM Hardy helped followings turn and develop into better soldiers and leaders. Which made the Army more of an effectual combat machine. By looking over CSM Hardy’s leading manner. characteristics/traits. and speaking with my wise man ; I was able to measure my leading manner and place my leading characteristics/traits. I have a good sense of wit. I take the enterprise. I am loyal. honest. brave. compassionate. magnetic. selfless. and I have a sense of responsibility. and unity. I value bravery. fairness. competency. subject. responsibility. regard. household and Commitment. My leading manners are magnetic leading. situational leading. and path-goal leading.
My leading is magnetic because I like to prophesy the bigger image to acquire followings to purchase in. By making so. work seems more meaningful. which increases production. My leading manner is situational because I base my attack depending on followers’ preparedness. My leading manner is path-goal oriented because I lead depending on the state of affairs. I like to do certain my followings have everything they need to cut down route blocks and carry through their ends as effectual and efficient as possible. In decision. as stated before I admire and seek to emulate myself after CSM Hardy.
Taking a expression mine and CSM Hardy’s characteristics/traits and what we value ; I would state we value the same things and are characteristics/traits are about the same. In order to better my effectivity as a leader. I need to understand my restrictions and cognize my strengths and failings. Understanding and cognizing these will assist me depute duty consequently. hire people who complement me. and cognize what countries I need to work on to go a better and more effectual leader. The manner I can work on my failings are to be invariably be cognizant of them. restrict the consequence of them. and work on them extensively to develop them into a strength.
Mention
Robbins. S. P. . & A ; Judge. T. A. ( 2013 ) . Organizational Behavior ( 15th ed. ) . Retrieved from The University of Phoenix eBook Collection database.
