I believe that animal testing is necessary.
Some animals may suffer for the
benifit of humans. if you prevent animal testing, should you stop people from
eating meat? Many scientists say that they can't cure deadly diseases without
using animals. I believe that animal testing is very necessary because it is
unethical to make people sick on purpose. Most experiments can only be
done on animals. As a result of animal testing we have discovered diseases. If
you prevent animals from being tested, should you stop people from eating
meat? Killing an animal for food isn't that different from killing an animal while
testing a new product or medicine.
Animal testing could be considered more
necessary than killing an animal for food. People enjoy the animal "products"
that they consume daily. Many scientists say that humans can't cure deadly
diseases without using animals. Without animal testing scientists believe that it
may take longer to find cures for diseas like aids, cancer and alzheimer's. Causing unnecessary suffering is wrong, but conducting experiments on
animals is necessary for human health.
The testing that scientists perform on
animals can save human lives Animal rights activists' claim that test tube
experiments,computer simulations and other methods are alternatives to
testing medicines and other products on animals. Many of these techniques
are valuable, and are used by scientists on a regular basis. The problems are
that they don't tell us everything we need to know. Mixing human cells with a
new drug in a test tube doesn't show how the drug will affect an entire human
body. Animals are far too complicated for computers to simulate perfectly. Animal testing is a very important step in improving human health.
Bibliography:
