The process of recruiting employees into a company is vital as these human resources are viewed to be a strategic investment. The success of companies largely depends on its human resource. Of late, higher learning institutions are churning out an unending supply of fresh graduates that add to the competition in the job market. Yet, the question arises whether the employer should hire these younger workers or to select from the more senior group. I believe that younger workers should be hired.

Firstly, employers should hire young workers because they are fresh and energetic. Apart from the advantage of age, young employees are flexible, ready to learn and are generally more enthusiastic about their work in the hope of gaining experience while vying for promotion. Given the opportunity to put their ideas into practice, they would contribute towards the productivity of the company. Secondly, with a higher education, young workers are better qualified for the job.

It cannot be denied that the changing world of business would require a workforce with greater technical skills, such as computer knowledge and e-business. In this respect, the older employees may be lagging behind since they belong to a different working experience. The third argument is that employers could save costs in hiring fresh graduates instead of paying more for more experienced workers. Seniority and the years of service rendered by the older employees would need to find its reward in a better pay package apart from higher positions in the corporate world.

On the contrary, younger workers will start at a lower budget and help companies save costs in the human resource department. An argument against hiring young workers is that they have less work experience compared to older workers. Needless to say, senior workers have the advantage here due to their many years of service and involvement in various job descriptions. A second counter-argument is that young workers are ambitious and so lack loyalty to the company compared to the older workers. Surveys often show that financial benefits are the top priority for most.

Being highly qualified and in demand, young workers tend to want to get to the top faster, and this means that they will take up whatever offers in the market which benefit them more. Even though young workers may lack in experience, they can be sent for training to improve their skills. Young people are at their most creative stage in life to cope with changes. So, they will learn faster and risk more in trying out new things. Another reason to refute the second counter is that despite having the tendency to switch jobs , young workers can be motivated to stay through various job benefits.

Apart from money, employees also look for challenges, advancement opportunities and a good work atmosphere as motivating factors. In conclusion, a younger workforce which adapts better to change, has better skills and technological knowledge as well as helps company to save costs will be the strong reasons for employment. Older workers may have their seniority as advantage but the fast changing world favours the young. Thus, I strongly believe that it is better to hire younger workers than older workers.