The main difference between film and dealt video Is the cost of recording and the look It personifies. Other differences include the weight ease of duplication and transportability. For a long time digital recordings suffered from inferior sound and image quality when projected onto large screens, but recent advances in computer processing storage and projection have overcome this problem for their use in theatres. Just in terms of the equipment needed a digital production Is about a % less Han the cost of mm film production. Unlike film, digital formats require very little physical storage space. One of the downfalls Is they can be easily duplicated and uploaded to the internet and a good point if this was legal is the film will not lose any of its quality in the process. This all sounds too good, however its not as easy as it looks, sure you can buy a DVD camera down the road and make a half decent picture if you put your mind to it but how Is It going to be screened? The problem Is cinemas have and have always had projectors that play mm film.
Too enable a cinema to show DVD then It Is going to have to import a lot of new technology. So to start the ball rolling cinemas around the world have to get rid of all the big projectors they have and always have used and refit the cinemas with new digital ones. The next step is they have to get online so they can stream the movie as the idea is to stream the movie which is all part of making digital films easier In all fields. However to be able to do all this will mean all different types of connections to be fitted Into the Coleman/multiplex.
In the long run oh can see this is a wise Investment although It leaves a lot of people Jobless such as movie distributors, celluloid companies not to mention assistant camera men/ women, sound men/women and other miscellaneous workers on movie sets. Well the truth is film studios don't really care about them there not the key factors to the revolution in film to Digital Video the main factor is Piracy and at the moment film piracy can not be controlled or suppressed. L "The US motion picture industry loses more than $3 billion annually in potential worldwide revenue due to piracy.
Due to the difficulty in calculating Internet piracy losses, these figures are NOT currently included in the overall loss estimates. However, it is safe to assume Internet losses cause untold additional damages to the industry" . 2 movie and that is Gorge Lucas for his prequel Editions to the Star Wars trilogy. Star Wars Episode 2 Attack Of The Clones. During the filming of the film Gorge Lucas used a DVD camera. 3 The Sony HAD (High Definition Camera) FIEF was the choice of camera, they shot at 24 progressive frames per second.
The 24 frames fit in perfectly with the radiations of film projection and editing. "By not using film, the production team saved the time and money usually invested in film stock and photochemical processing, and was able to attain an image of incredible clarity already in the digital medium ready for postposition use" . 4 It has also been noted that actors themselves would rather work in-front of a DVD. There reasons for this are when working with DVD there are often two cameras (whereas with mm there is only one) so they feel freer too work in-front of two rather than Just the one.
Related essay: “Advantages and Disadvantages of Technology”
Another is that there is less pressure if they make a mistake as it won't result in a loss of money because there is no film in the camera Just memory it can easily be deleted and redone in a matter of seconds. One of the flaws is because you have so much freeness and ample memory with the camera you can actually loose track of you recording and end up with to much footage. An example of this is when a documentary was being filmed there was so much space on the memory of the camera that 1 rush of memory was recorded for a Air documentary, it turned out that it took a whole year to edit down.
This obviously seems a problem in a sense that all first time film makers are going to record hundreds of hours of footage but not necessarily because they can now have the software to edit their work on a home PC which means they can put more hours in at home to finish the job. I think recording in DVD is a great idea when you think it opens the doors to so many more different genres of people. Hollywood may be against it for reasons I can sympathies with, you only have to look at the music industry to see how much anarchy piracy has caused but I don't think they should rule it out.