"Restore the Emperor Expel the Barbarians": The Causes of the Showa Restoration Sonno joi, "Restore the Emperor and expel the Barbarians," was the
battle cry that ushered in the Showa Restoration in Japan during the
1930's.Footnote1 The Showa Restoration was a combination of Japanese nationalism,
Japanese expansionism, and Japanese militarism all carried out in the name of
the Showa Emperor, Hirohito. Unlike the Meiji Restoration, the Showa Restoration
was not a resurrection of the Emperor's powerFootnote2, instead it was aimed at
restoring Japan's prestige. During the 1920's, Japan appeared to be developing a
democratic and peaceful government. It had a quasi-democratic governmental body,
the Diet,Footnote3 and voting rights were extended to all male
citizens.Footnote4 Yet, underneath this seemingly placid surface, lurked
momentous problems that lead to the Showa Restoration. The transition that Japan
made from its parliamentary government of the 1920's to the Showa Restoration
and military dictatorship of the late 1930s was not a sudden transformation.

Liberal forces were not toppled by a coup overnight. Instead, it was gradual,
feed by a complex combination of internal and external factors.

We will write a custom essay sample on

Restore the Emperor Expel the Barbarians: The Ca specifically for you

for only $13.90/page

Order Now

The history that links the constitutional settlement of 1889 to the
Showa Restoration in the 1930s is not an easy story to relate. The
transformation in Japan's governmental structure involved; the historical period
between 1868 and 1912 that preceded the Showa Restoration. This period of
democratic reforms was an underlying cause of the militarist reaction that lead
to the Showa Restoration. The transformation was also feed by several immediate
causes; such as, the downturn in the global economy in 1929Footnote5 and the
invasion of Manchuria in 1931.Footnote6 It was the convergence of these external,
internal, underlying and immediate causes that lead to the military dictatorship
in the 1930's.

The historical period before the Showa Restoration, 1868-1912, shaped
the political climate in which Japan could transform itself from a democracy to
a militaristic state. This period is known as the Meiji Restoration.Footnote7
The Meiji Restoration of 1868 completely dismantled the Tokugawa political order
and replaced it with a centralized system of government headed by the Emperor
who served as a figure head.Footnote8 However, the Emperor instead of being a
source of power for the Meiji Government, became its undoing. The Emperor was
placed in the mystic position of demi-god by the leaders of the Meiji
Restoration. Parliamentarians justified the new quasi-democratic government of
Japan, as being the "Emperor's Will." The ultra-nationalist and militaristic
groups took advantage of the Emperor's status and claimed to speak for the
Emperor.Footnote9 These then groups turned the tables on the parliamentarians by
claiming that they, not the civil government, represented the "Imperial Will."
The parliamentarians, confronted with this perversion of their own policy,
failed to unite against the militarists and nationalists. Instead, the
parliamentarians compromised with the nationalists and militarists groups and
the general populace took the nationalists' claims of devotion to the Emperor at
face value, further bolstering the popularity of the nationalists.Footnote10 The
theory of "Imperial Will" in Japan's quasi-democratic government became an
underlying flaw in the government's democratic composition.

It was also during the Meiji Restoration that the Japanese economy
began to build up its industrial base. It retooled, basing itself on the western
model. The Japanese government sent out investigators to learn the ways of
European and American industries.Footnote11 In 1889, the Japanese government
adopted a constitution based on the British and German models of parliamentary
democracy. During this same period, railroads were constructed, a banking system
was started and the samurai system was disbanded.Footnote12 Indeed, it seemed as
if Japan had successfully made the transition to a western style industrialized
state. Almost every other non-western state failed to make this leap forward
from pre-industrial nation to industrialized power. For example, China failed to
make this leap. It collapsed during the 1840s and the European powers followed
by Japan, sought to control China by expropriating its raw materials and
exploiting its markets.

By 1889, when the Japanese ConstitutionFootnote13 was adopted, Japan,
with a few minor setbacks, had been able to make the transition to a world power
through its expansion of colonial holdings.Footnote14 During the first World War,
Japan's economy and colonial holdings continued to expand as the western powers
were forced to focus on the war raging in Europe. During the period 1912-1926,
the government continued on its democratic course. In 1925, Japan extended
voting rights to all men and the growth of the merchant class
continued.Footnote15 But these democratic trends, hid the fact that it was only
the urban elite's who were benefiting from the growing industrialization. The
peasants, who outnumbered the urban population were touched little by the
momentous changes this lead to discontent in a majority of the populace.

During the winter of 1921-1922, the Japanese government participated in
a conference in Washington to limit the naval arms race. The Washington
Conference successfully produced an agreement, the Five Power Treaty. Part of
the Treaty established a ratio of British, American, Japanese, Italian, and
French ships to the ratio respectively of 5:5:3:1.75:1.75.Footnote16 Other parts
of the Five Power Treaty forced other naval powers to refrain from building
fortifications in the Pacific and Asia. In return, Japan agreed to give up its
colonial possessions in Siberia and China.Footnote17 In 1924, Japan cut its
standing Army and further reduced the size of the Japanese military budget. It
appeared to all that Japan was content to rely on expansion through trade
instead of military might.Footnote18 However, this agreement applauded by the
Western Powers, symbolized to many of the nationalists and militarists that the
Japanese Government had capitulated to the West. During the Showa Restoration,
ten years later, these agreements were often cited as examples of where the
quasi-democratic Japanese government had gone astray.Footnote19
The time preceding the Showa Restoration appeared at first glance to be
the image of a nation transforming itself into a full-fledged democracy. But
this picture hid huge chasms that were about to open up with the end of the
1920's. Three precipitating circumstances at the beginning of the 1930's
shattered Japan's democratic underpinnings, which had been far from firm: the
downturn in the world economy, Western shunning of Japan, and the independence
of Japan's military. Thus, the shaky democracy gave way to the Showa Restoration.

This Restoration sought to not only restore the Showa Emperor, Hirohito to power,
but lead Japan into a new period of expansionism and eventually into World War
II.

The first event that put Japan on the path toward the Showa Restoration
was the downturn in the world economy. It wrecked havoc with Japan's economy.

World War I had permitted phenomenal industrial growth, but after the war ended,
Japan resumed its competition with the other European powers. This renewed
competition proved economically painful. During the 1920's, Japan grew more
slowly than at any other time since the Meiji Restoration.Footnote20 During this
time the whole world was in an economic slump, Japan's economy suffered
inordinately. Japan's rural economy was particularly hard-hit by the slump in
demand for its two key products, silk and rice. The sudden collapse of the
purchasing power of the nations that imported Japanese silk such as America; and
the worldwide rise in tariffs, combined to stagnate the Japanese
economy.Footnote21
In urban Japan, there were also serious economic problems. A great gap
in productivity and profitability had appeared between the new industries that
had emerged with the industrialization of Japan and the older traditional
industries. The Japanese leadership was not attuned to such obstacles and thus
was slow to pass legislation to deal with its problems.Footnote22 The Meiji
government had supported its economic planning by claiming it would be
beneficial to the economy in the long-run. When Meiji government promises of
economic growth evaporated, the Japanese turned toward non-democratic groups who
now promised them a better economic future.Footnote23 The nationalist and
militaristic groups promised that they would restore Japanese economic wealth by
expanding Japanese colonial holdings which the democratic leaders had given up.

At the same time that Japan was struggling economically, and
capitulating to the West in adopting democratic principals, many in Japan
believed that western nations did not fully accept Japan as an equal. It
appeared to Japan, that the West had not yet accepted Japan into the exclusive
club of the four conquering nations of World War I.Footnote24 Events such as the
Washington Conference, at which the Five Power Treaty was signed, seemed to many
Japanese hostile to Japan. (This belief was held because the Treaty forced Japan
to have a number of ships smaller than Britain and the United States by a factor
of 3 to 5.) The Japanese Exclusion Act passed in 1924 by America to exclude
Japanese immigrants again ingrained in the Japanese psyche that Japan was viewed
as inferior by the West.Footnote25 This view became widely believed after the
meetings at Versailles, where it appeared to Japan that Europe was not willing
to relinquish its possessions in Asia. Added to this perceived feeling of being
shunned was the Japanese military conception that war with the west was
inevitable. This looming confrontation was thought to be the war to end all wars
saishu senso. Footnote26
The third circumstance was the independent Japanese military that
capitalized on the economic downturn and capitulation of the Japanese government
to the West.Footnote27 The Japanese military argued that the parliamentarian
government had capitulated to the west by making an unfavorable agreement about
the size of the Japanese Navy (the Washington Conference and the Five Powers
Treaty) and by reducing the size of the military in 1924. With the depression
that struck Japan in 1929; the military increased their attack on the government
politicians for the failure of the Meiji Restoration. Throughout the 1920's,
they demanded change. As the Japanese economy worsened their advocacy for a
second revolutionary restoration, a "Showa Restoration" began to be listened
to.Footnote28 They argued that the Showa Restoration would restore the grandeur
of Japan. Leading right-wing politicians joined the military clamor, calling for
a restoration not just of the Emperor but of Japan as a global power.Footnote29
1929 marked the world wide Great Depression. International trade was at
a standstill and countries resorted to nationalistic economic policies. 1929
became a Japanese turning point. The Japanese realized that they had
governmental control over only a small area compared to the large area they
needed to support their industrializing economy.Footnote30 Great Britain, France,
and the Netherlands had huge overseas possessions and the Russians and Americans
both had vast continental holdings. In comparison, Japan had only a small
continental base. To many Japanese, it appeared they had started their
territorial acquisitions and colonization too late and had been stopped too soon.

The situation was commonly described as a "population problem."Footnote31 The
white races had already grabbed the most valuable lands and had left the less
desirable for the Japanese. The Japanese nationalists argued that Japan had been
discriminated against by the western nations through immigration policies and by
being forced to stop their expansion into Asia. The only answer, the
nationalists claimed, was military expansion onto the nearby Asian continent.

The nationalists and independent military became the foremost advocates
of this new drive for land and colonies. Young army officers and nationalist
civilians closely identified with the "Imperial Way Faction."Footnote32 The
relative independence of the Japanese armed forces from the parliament,
transformed this sense of a national crisis into a total shift in foreign policy.

These "restorationists" in the military and in the public stepped up the crisis
by convincing the nation that there were two enemies, the foreign powers and
people within Japan.Footnote33 The militarists identified the Japanese
"Bureaucratic Elite" and the expanding merchant class, the "Zaibutsu" as
responsible for Japan's loss of grandeur. It was the Bureaucratic Elite who had
capitulated to the Western powers in the Washington Conference and in subsequent
agreements, that decreased the size of the Japanese military,Footnote34 and made
Japan dependent of trade with other nations.

The independence of the Japanese military allowed them to feed this
nationalist sense of crisis and thus transform Japanese foreign policy. On
September 18, 1931 a group of army officers with the approval of their superiors
who were angry at the government for its passage of the Five Powers Treaty,
bombed a section of the South Manchurian Railway and blamed it on unnamed
Chinese terrorists.Footnote35 Citing the explosion as a security concern, the
Japanese military invaded Manchuria and within six months had set up the Puppet
State of Manchukuo in February, 1932.Footnote36
Following the invasion of Manchuria, Japanese nationalism overwhelmed
Japan. The Japanese public and military continued to blame the former quasi-
parliamentarians for the economic woes and for capitulating to the Western. The
Japanese populace saw the military and its nationalist leaders as strong,
willing to stand up to Western power and restore the grandeur of Japan. Unlike
the parliamentarian leaders, these new nationalist leaders backed by the
military, had a vision and the public flocked to their side.Footnote37 This new
mood in Japan brought an end to party cabinets and the authority of the quasi-
democratic government. It seemed now that the parliamentary democracy of the
TaishoFootnote38 and Meiji eras had been fully usurped by the independent
military. Nationalism swept through Japan after the invasion of Manchuria, thus
further strengthening the hand of the military. In the invasion of Manchuria and
its aftermath, all the discontent with the Meiji system of government come
together and combined with the military claim to leadership ordained by the
power of the Emperor. With this convergence of events, the shallow roots of
democracy and the liberal reformism of the Meiji Restoration were uprooted and
replaced with a combination of nationalism and militarism embodied under the
idea of the Showa Restoration. When League of Nations condemned Japan for the
Manchurian invasion, Japan, now controlled by the military, simply walked out of
the conference.Footnote39
The parliamentary cabinet of the 1930's became known as "national
unity" cabinets and the parliament took on more and more of a symbolic role as
the military gradually gained the upper hand over policies. The Japanese
Parliament continued in operation and the major democratic parties continued to
win elections in 1932, 1936 and 1937. But parliamentary control was waning as
the military virtually controlled foreign policy.Footnote40
Japan's political journey from its nearly democratic government of the
1920's to its radical nationalism of the mid 1930's, the collapse of democratic
institutions, and the eventual military state was not an overnight
transformation. There was no coup d'etat, no march on Rome, no storming of the
Bastille, no parliamentary vote whereby the anti-democratic militaristic
elements overthrew the democratic institutions of the Meiji Era. Instead, it was
a political journey that allowed a semi-democratic nation to transform itself
into a military dictatorship. The forces that aided in this transformation were
the failed promises of the Meiji Restoration that were represented in the
stagnation of the Japanese economy, the perceived capitulation of the Japanese
parliamentary leaders to the western powers, and an independent military.

Japanese militarism promised to restore the grandeur of Japan, a Showa
Restoration.


Footnote1
Ruth Benedict, The Chrysanthemum And The Sword (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company,
1989) 76.


Footnote2
Marius B. Jansen Sakamoto Ryoma and the Meiji Restoration (Stanford: Stanford
University Press, 1971) 147-164. Marius B. Jansen makes clear in this book that
the Meiji Restoration (1868-1912) was a movement centered around returning the
Meiji Emperor to power. Only later did the Meiji Restoration come to embody
liberal reformism.


Footnote3
Frank Gibney Japan the Fragile Superpower (New York: Meridian, 1985) 158-159.


Footnote4
Tetsuo Najita Japan The Intellectual Foundations of Modern Japanese Politics
(Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1980) 121. In 1925 universal male suffrage
was enacted.


Footnote5
Tetsuo Najita Japan The Intellectual Foundations of Modern Japanese Politics
(Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1980) 113.


Footnote6
Edwin O. Reischauer Japan Past and Present (Tokyo: Charles Tuttle Company, 1987)
170-171.


Footnote7
Karel van Wolferen The Enigma of Japanese Power (New York: Random House, 1990)
375-376. During the Meiji Restoration Japan saw its mission to be to catch up
with the already industrialized Western powers.


Footnote8
Edwin O. Reischauer Japan Past and Present (Tokyo: Charles Tuttle Company,
1987)125.


Footnote9
Tetsuo Najita Japan The Intellectual Foundations of Modern Japanese Politics
(Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1980) 115.


Footnote10
Edwin O. Reischauer The Japanese Today (Cambridge: Harvard University Press,
1988) 98.


Footnote11
Frank Gibney Japan the Fragile Superpower (New York: Meridian, 1985) 165-166.


Footnote12
Edwin O. Reischauer Japan Past and Present (Tokyo: Charles Tuttle Company, 1987)
119. During the Meiji Restoration Samurais were stripped of their positions and
even prohibited from wearing the Samurai Sword in 1869.


Footnote13
Frank K, Upham Law and Social Change in Japan (Cambridge: Harvard University
Press, 1987) 49. The Japanese constitution was adopted in 1889. It set up a
British type parliament. The constitution did not provide the parliamentary
government with power over the military branch.


Footnote14
Karel van Wolferen The Enigma of Japanese Power (New York: Random House, 1990)
38. At the turn of the century Japan had started its colonizing effort in China
and other parts of Asia. It was these efforts at Colonization that developed
into the Russo-Japanese War (1904-1905). After winning the war Japan continued
with even more gusto to snatch up colonies in Asia.


Footnote15
Tetsuo Najita Japan The Intellectual Foundations of Modern Japanese Politics
(Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1980) 121. In 1925 universal male suffrage
was enacted although in most elections ballots were only made available to the
urban elite.


Footnote16
Edwin O. Reischauer The Japanese Today (Cambridge: Harvard University Press,
1988) 96.


Footnote17
Edwin O. Reischauer Japan Past and Present (Tokyo: Charles Tuttle Company, 1987)
150.


Footnote18
James B. Crawley Japan's Quest For Autonomy (Princeton: Princeton University
Press, 1966) 270-280.


Footnote19
Tetsuo Najita Japan The Intellectual Foundations of Modern Japanese Politics
(Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1980) 128.


Footnote20
Karel van Wolferen The Enigma of Japanese Power (New York: Random House, 1990)
380-381. In her Book Karel van Wolferen writes, "The Success of the Meiji
oligarchy in stimulating economic development was followed by a further great
boost for Japanese industry deriving from the First World War. This good fortune
came to an end in 1920, and a 'chain of panics' caused successive recessions and
business dislocation".


Footnote21
Edwin O. Reischauer Japan Past and Present (Tokyo: Charles Tuttle Company, 1987)
117. Reischauer makes the point in his book that external factors significantly
hurt Japan's economy. Unlike a nation like the United States which had vast
reserves of natural resources when projectionist trade laws were implemented
around the world Japan suffered significantly because it lacked raw materials
and markets. Japan's economy which was guided during the Meiji Era to be
primarily an export based economy.


Footnote22
Nakamura Takafusa Economic Growth in Prewar Japan (New Haven: Yale University
Press, 1983) 151-158. Nakamura Takafusa states that Japan was growing at vastly
different rates between the urban areas and rural areas.


Footnote23
Frank Gibney Japan the Fragile Superpower (New York: Meridian, 1985) 165-166.


Footnote24
James B. Crawley Japan's Quest For Autonomy (Princeton: Princeton University
Press, 1966) 270-280.


Footnote25
David M. Reimers Still the Golden Door: The Third World Comes to America (New
York: Columbia Press, 1992) 27.


Footnote26
Tetsuo Najita Japan The Intellectual Foundations of Modern Japanese Politics
(Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1980) 128. "The exclusion of Japanese
Immigrants by the United States in 1924 and the growth of mechanized Soviet
Power on the Asian continent all confirmed in the Japanese public eye the
impending confrontation with the west." Testsuo views the rise of Japanese
nationalism and militarization resulting in the Showa Restoration to be to a
large degree the fault of the west for its maltreatment of Japan diplomatically.

Tetsuo also views the Showa Restoration to be largely caused by external factors
that in consequence unbalanced the fragile Japanese political system.


Footnote27
Robert Story The Double Patriots (London: Chatto and Windus, 1957) 138.


Footnote28
Karel van Wolferen The Enigma of Japanese Power (New York: Random House, 1990)
380-381.


Footnote29
Tetsuo Najita Japan The Intellectual Foundations of Modern Japanese Politics
(Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1980) 114. One of the famous political
leaders of the time Miyake Setsurei called for a new Japan that had "truth,
goodness, and beauty".


Footnote30
James Morley Dilemmas of Growth in Prewar Japan (Princeton: Princeton University
Press, 1971) 378-411.


Footnote31
Peter Duus The Rise of Modern Japan (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1976). Many of
the nationalists of this period claimed the West had tricked Japan into giving
up its colonies in Asia so it could take them. The Nationalists also claimed
that renewed Japanese expansionism would liberate the Asians of their European
Colonizers.


Footnote32
Tetsuo Najita Japan The Intellectual Foundations of Modern Japanese Politics
(Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1980) 130. The Imperial Way Faction was a
right wing political party that called for the Showa Restoration. It was lead by
Kita Ikki, Gondo Seikei, and Inoue Nissho.


Footnote33
Karel van Wolferen The Enigma of Japanese Power (New York: Random House, 1990)
381-382.


Footnote34
Tetsuo Najita Japan The Intellectual Foundations of Modern Japanese Politics
(Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1980) 128.


Footnote35
Tetsuo Najita Japan The Intellectual Foundations of Modern Japanese Politics
(Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1980) 138. Historians such as Testuo Najita
cite this incident as the turning point in the military role in Japan. For after
this incident the Military realized that the parliamentary government did not
have the will or the power to stop the military power.


Footnote36
Edwin O. Reischauer The Japanese Today (Cambridge: Harvard University Press,
1988) 96.


Footnote37
Edwin O. Reischauer Japan Past and Present (Tokyo: Charles Tuttle Company, 1987)
171. Edwin O Reischauer writes in his book, "There could be no doubt that the
Japanese army in Manchuria had been eminently successful, The people as a whole
accepted this act of unauthorized and certainly unjustified warfare with whole
hearted admiration".


Footnote38
Peter Duus The Rise of Modern Japan (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1976) 156. The
period preceding the Showa Restoration and coming after the Meiji Era is known
as the Taisho Era. It is named after the Taisho Emperor who was mentally
incompetent and thus the parliamentarians during this time had control of the
government. His reign lasted only a decade compared to the Meiji Emperor's 44
year reign.


Footnote39
Edwin O. Reischauer Japan Past and Present (Tokyo: Charles Tuttle Company, 1987)
171.


Footnote40
Tetsuo Najita Japan The Intellectual Foundations of Modern Japanese Politics
(Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1980) 138.