May be a pint of blood can promote economic growth,so,let also belongs to egoism(Shaw et blood trading whether to follow business ethics,in my opinion depending on the needs of the recipient,not the opposite. Philosopher Peter Singer elaborated this point in the blood,'elf blood is the rice of a commodity,donation only means to save other people's money;. (p/99)So if the blood successful sale transaction,both to meet the needs of those who also grew by commercial interests,belongs 'a double win pay. . Did Plasma international strike a fair bargain with the West Africans who supplied their blood to the company? Or is Plasma guilty of exploiting them in some way? Explain your answer. I would agree that the bargain here was not fall. Plasma International until a Tampa paper charged that Plasma was purchasing blood for as little as 15 cents a pint and hen reselling it to hospital in the United States and South America for $peer pint.
Blood,low sell high income as a worthless commodity. I supposed Plasma international is quality. But West African,large population,backward development,so, 3. Many believe that commercialism's is increasing in all areas of modern life. elf so,is it something to be applauded or condemned? L's it wrong to treat certain things-such as human organs-as commodities? Human organs-applauded,we can help poor person who needs organs,but commodities Is different.