In America's working society today, each company has a code of ethics that they utilize in providing their organization with as a reference to guide them in their accountability and to help them in circumstances that they might find unethical in disposition. The American College of Healthcare Executives (ACHE) is an international professional society of more than 30,000 healthcare executives who lead hospitals, healthcare systems and other healthcare organizations (www. ACHE. org).
The organization is known for their educational programs including the annual Congress on Healthcare Leadership (www. ACHE. org). ACHE’s works towards their goal of being the premier professional society for healthcare executives dedicated to improving healthcare delivery (www. ACHE. org). This paper will explain the code of ethics that the majority of professional organizations implement to providing their organizations with a system to guide them in the achievement of their job obligations, in circumstances that might be otherwise ethically wrong.
Self Assessment and The Ethics of Self-Assessment can truly assist and label those areas that are based on strong ethical ground; areas that you may wish to consider and examine the basis for your responses; and opportunities for further reflection (www. ACHE. org). This is not a scoring assessment so therefore; each individual has different opinions and therefore, cannot be scored numerically.
This Self-Assessment can help provide medical professionals and recognize those areas in which they have a strong ethical ground; areas that they may wish to examine or survey the basis for their responses; and opportunities for further consideration (www. ACHE. org). The concept of procedural justice is the common use of organizational decision-making. This application describes to organizations that they need to depend on an intentional process to promote fairness through a clear understanding of all competing values in response to a particular ethical conflict (Nelson, 2009).
In order to be successful, the decision makers really need to consider the perceptions and values of all the people who are influenced with the decisions that maybe able to permit them to analyze different options and how the options are driven by underlying values (Nelson, 2009). There are never any simple or clear answers to the consequences of ranking priorities; however; the organization’s mission and value statement may provide guidance when ranking the interests or values of one over another (Nelson, 2009). The Ethical Decision-Making Process includes eight steps.
Explaining the ethical conflict is the first step. The questions should be positively outlined so that each individual included need to be able to acknowledge or agree that this is an ethical question. If the conflict discovered is not an ethical question then it would need to be assigned to another person to re-examine. The second step is to determine all of the individuals and/or programs that are affiliated with the ethical question at hand. Comprehending the situation involving the ethical conflict is the third step in this process.
This step is to supply a great amount of facts and findings that includes why the question has come to light, how it is presently delivered in the organization or particular department (Nelson, 2009). It is valuable to determine the economic, patient care, legal, and/or community concern (Nelson, 2009). The fourth step is to determine the ethical outlooks that are relevant to the conflict. Identifying or determining the actions and responses that can be taken to break down the ethical question/issue is the fifth step in this process.
The individuals included with the decision making process needs to ensure that they have systematically and quantitatively evaluated each decision which is considered to be the sixth step (Nelson, 2009). The seventh step is to share and implement the decisions. The decisions need to be openly communicated along with the ethical reasons behind them (Nelson, 2009). Each individual affected must examine the agreement to guarantee that it accomplish their desired goal. Analyzing and communicating the outcome can be either formal or informal depending upon the circumstances.
If the outcomes course of action does not resolve the problem then the organization needs to examine other options that are determined or based on the information that they have (Nelson, 2009). Writers Self Assessment Analysis. This writer was able to understand what areas she was strong in as well as indicating what areas she needed to reconsider and make better. Through researching and examining the questions that were answered with either frequently or generally the writer understands how important it was to keep in mind the code of ethics while dealing with each situation.
The decisions made and the actions taken into account to ethical questions are urgent because of their direct impact on the quality of care (Nelson, 2009). After re-evaluating the Ethical Self-Assessment the writer notices the importance of the Utilitarianism Theory also know as Social Consequentalism. This theory signifies that the moral worth of an action is exclusively decided by its contribution to overall utility, that is, its contribution to happiness or pleasure as summed among all persons (Hoffman et al, 2008).
This theory holds that one should act so as to do the greatest good for the greatest number (meaning that the moral worth of an action is determined by its outcome the ends justify the means (Hoffman et al, 2008). In conclusion, ethical self-assessments are detrimental and must be utilized as an important tool in all health care organizations. The various problems established within this organization cannot afford to go unseen ethically. Each individual plays an important role in the accomplishment of health care and there are various amounts of ethical problems in regards to quality, opportunity and carelessness.
The self-assessment tool when analyzed thoroughly can help everyone involved in the decision making of their organization particularly with the affluence of problems that are established daily which cannot afford to be disregarded. It provides adequate resources for every organization to handle updated circumstances efficiently and ethically so that the processes are handled effectively and that every person involved understands what their specific role is within the organization and process.